RfC: Is the band British or English?[edit]

Is Dire Straits a British band or an English band? Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

RfC: Is Mark Knopfler British or English or Scottish?[edit]

Is Mark Knopfler British or English or Scottish? Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

RfC: Is David Knopfler British or English or Scottish?[edit]

Is David Knopfler British or English or Scottish? Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Genre[edit]

Knopfler describes Dire Straits as a "rock 'n' roll orchestra" which, with dual keyboards, is not comparable to the definition of "hard rock" as being like Led Zeppelin, The Who, Deep Purple, Aerosmith, AC/DC and Van Halen. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell are you people? Have you ever heard the music, or is it all "Money for nothing"? Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"isn't even a fan of Dire Straits' early hits."[edit]

The above appears, as a quote, in the discussion of the possibility of a reunion. (It's not clear whether it's being attributed to Knopfler or Illsley.) However, that quote doesn't appear in either of the sources cited. Is this a real quote, and if so, who said it and where? 24.76.164.207 (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If Dire Straits were ...[edit]

Is the use of the plural past tense correct, in the opening sentence: "Dire Straits were a British rock band..."?

Yes, when used as a noun to describe a narrow passage of water connecting two seas or two large areas of water, you would use "the straits were wide" for example.

In this case, Dire Straits refers to a proper noun, combined with the fact:

"To Be” is the only English verb with two past tense forms, but only “were” is used in unreal conditional sentences.[1]

Conditional sentence -- meaning used in combination with 'if' and 'were'.

Example: If I were in a band, it would be Dire Straits.

Using "were" instead of "was" tells the reader I was not, and definitely am not, a member of the band Dire Straits, but rather if in the future by some strange pretzel-type twist of fate -- I could be, I would be. (Another way to say "were" is "was to be".)

Dire Straits did exist and is not a plural noun rather a singular thing, a band, therefore, a band is and was, not were.

(Mark Knopfler has a degree in English from Leeds. I think he would appreciate this edit. :))

Thanks Lakemcdougall (talk) 22:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lakemcdougall: This article is written in British English and were is correct. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

I keep making factually and historically correct edits that are repeatedly undone by Duffy BT and Fnlayson. There is no bias in my remarks, but there is bias without them[edit]

I make factually and historically correct edits that are repeatedly undone by Duffy BT and Fnlayson. There is no bias in my remarks, but there is bias without them. This is a page about Dire Straits, not Mark Knopfler, who has his own Wikipedia page. While Mark is obviously a big part of Dire Straits, it was a band, and Duffy BT and Fnlayson seem to have forgotten that fact. I am accused of having a bias towards Alan Clark, who was a member of this band from 1980 until 1994, and who is widely regarded as the most significant, influential member of the band besides Mark, and yet before I intervened, there was only one brief mention of him. There seems to have been been a concerted campaign on this site to rewrite the history of Dire Straits. While I may not be providing references for all of my edits, they are historically and factually 100% correct, and if DuffyBT and Fnlayson wish to change these edits, they must prove otherwise. Thanks, Billybotto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billybotto (talkcontribs) 09:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Duffy BT and Fnlayson: to the discussion. Schazjmd (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Billybotto, You are not citing sources for your additions (see WP:VERIFY and WP:CITE). A lot of it seems to be excess details or out of place details for this article (maybe more fitting in Alan Clark's article instead). A lot of this has been stated in edit summaries, check the article history. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Billybotto significantly changed their original post after it had been responded to by Fnlayson.

Billybotto, you can't simply declare "historically and factually 100% correct". You must provide reliable sources. The responsibility to provide verifiability for your edits is on you. Schazjmd (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Billybotto, reliable sources are independent of the subject of the article. The website http://www.alanclarkmusic.com/ is not independent. Schazjmd (talk) 15:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As previously stated, every fact and every statement I have added/edited is factually and historically correct. Some of these appear on alanclarkmusic.com/news, and think we can assume Alan wouldn't publish anything that wasn't true. These facts came from the horses mouth, so to speak, whereas "cited sources" are second-hand statements have been published by journalists etc. When I first came to this page, I was appalled at the lack of mentions of Alan, whose contribution to Dire Straits is immense and indisputable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billybotto (talkcontribs) 19:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Billybotto, please read WP:RS and learn what is considered a reliable source. Schazjmd (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]