GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 08:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Consider reducing some quotes here and there; a bunch of copy changes; one copy change suggestion based on my reading of a reference. Your biggest problem is that you may have to suffice with no images in this article, as the copyright status of them appears doubtful. Ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 18:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes[edit]

I took this on because one thing I look for specifically at GAN are articles from the Spanish-speaking world. Hablo español y he escrito artículos con casi 100 por ciento de las fuentes en español. Por lo tanto soy calificada para identificar errores comunes al pensar en español y escribir en inglés.

Lead[edit]

Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you be more specific?. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Early life[edit]

Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Film career[edit]

Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further work[edit]

Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and spot checks[edit]

Fixed. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

The images concern me. Both were uploaded by User:Art2233 to Commons. Unfortunately, I doubt they had permission to use the image. The Berlin Festival image, currently in the infobox, has EXIF metadata indicating © Berlinale Panorama / Ronny Heine. It looks like the San Sebastián image is cropped from something, but I am not sure what. To obtain rights to use the former image correctly, the Berlinale would have to fill out what is known as a VRT ticket (commons:COM:VRT). I have initiated a deletion proceeding for the Berlin image on Commons. Pinging Jaespinoza to make him aware of this early. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 08:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you recommend me to remove them?. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking this article and your imput. I will be waiting to continue Sammi Brie. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jaespinoza It is unfortunately necessary to remove them to continue. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, Sammi Brie. Javier Espinoza (talk) 05:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.