Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: @TechnoSquirrel69, @Taking Out The Trash and for future reviewers until the Draft:Daniel Seavey page is dealt with by an admin:

Fork99 (talk) 00:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fastily: pinging involved admin who deleted Daniel Seavey per WP:CSD#R2 before it was recreated. Fork99 (talk) 00:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information, Fork99; this is a weird situation for sure. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone know if a round-robin page move would make more sense in this case actually? Then, Draft:Daniel Seavey can be deleted with trivial edit history. Considering the lack of admins willing to deal with the currently 4 requests for history merges. Fork99 (talk) 04:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh but I just realised this talk discussion would be deleted under that scenario... what have I gotten into. Fork99 (talk) 04:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Novem Linguae: thank you for fixing it all up, much appreciated! Fork99 (talk) 06:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]