Daniel Parslow has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 19, 2007 Articles for deletion Kept January 28, 2008 Articles for deletion Kept October 31, 2013 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Football: England / Wales / English non-league Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Welsh football task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Wales Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Danny Parslow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 08:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Well its a nice article for the track but still minor stuffs to look for.[reply]
Lead

• Its better to mention whom he succeeded as the captain
  • Have mentioned this in the lead, as well as in the main body as it wasn't already there. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiff City

• His trial with the Swans is mentioned but was that successful?
  • Expanded. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

York City

• Why were Greaves and McGurk out of team?
  • I think all that we need to tell the readers is that they were absent; I'm not sure that why they were out of the team is relevant in this article. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Parslow and McGurk were appointed as club captains for 2009-10-Well how it is possible?One is the captain and another is vice.
  • It's certainly an unusual situation, but all I can do is go by what the source says. The source provides a quote from McGurk, and reads: "I was pretty sure he was going to keep the captain's armband because he did well with it last season but the gaffer told both of us that we're club captains." Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• McGurk suspended-How he was suspended?Red card or any improper behaviour?
  • Same as two points above, I'm not sure it's pertinent to this article. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life

• An expansion will be useful.Information can be sprinkled like about his parents, fiance etc.
  • I've been unable to find anything to add, I'll keep an eye out though. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RRD13 (talk) 08:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: - Nice article on a player of League Two.RRD13 (talk) 06:49, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]