GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vanderwaalforces (talk · contribs) 16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 04:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I will (hopefully) review this within the month. But before I do I have a question: are there any other RS sources available about Wambebe? The source from the Guardian is doing a ton of heavy lifting, and it would be preferable for a GA to not rely too heavily on a single source. Template:LunaEatsTunaSig (talk), posted at 04:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEatsTuna Thanks for picking this review up. I do not see any major problem with the Guardian source. Besides, there’s also a SIGCOV at TWAS. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds alright to me; makes the spotcheck easier! Template:LunaEatsTunaSig (talk), posted at 01:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Da review:

@LunaEatsTuna Checks out :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! I am now happy to pass this article for GA status. Congrats! ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2017 – posted at 18:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Spotcheck
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.