The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
I can't read the WSJ article, but the NYT article is about "the network"/"Brian Timpone's network"/"Timpone network" (as they refer to it.) Metric Media just happens to be the most forward facing element of the network at the moment - in 2012, the same could be said about Journatic. Mcrsftdog (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That hadn't occurred to me. Makes sense. Novellasyes (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Metro Business Network
Websites published by Metric Media include titles in the "Metro Business Network":[1]
Alabama Business Daily (albusinessdaily.com)
Alaska Business Daily (akbusinessdaily.com)
Arizona Business Daily (azbusinessdaily.com)
Arkansas Business Daily (arbusinessdaily.com)
California Business Daily (cabusinessdaily.com)
Colorado Business Daily (cobusinessdaily.com)
Connecticut Business Daily (ctbusinessdaily.com)
D.C. Business Daily (dcbusinessdaily.com)
Delaware Business Daily (debusinessdaily.com)
Florida Business Daily (flbusinessdaily.com)
Georgia Business Daily (gabusinessdaily.com)
Hawaii Business Daily (hibusinessdaily.com)
Idaho Business Daily (idbusinessdaily.com)
Illinois Business Daily (ilbusinessdaily.com)
Indiana Business Daily (indianabusinessdaily.com)
Iowa Business Daily (iabusinessdaily.com)
Kansas Business Daily (ksbusinessdaily.com)
Kentucky Business Daily (kybusinessdaily.com)
Keystone Business News, Pennsylvania (keystonebusinessnews.com)
Louisiana Business Daily (labusinessdaily.com)
Maryland Business Daily (mdbusinessdaily.com)
Massachusetts Business Daily (mabusinessdaily.com)
Michigan Business Daily (mibusinessdaily.com)
Minnesota Business Daily (mnbusinessdaily.com)
Mississippi Business Daily (msbusinessdaily.com)
Missouri Business Daily (mobusinessdaily.com)
Montana Business Daily (mtbusinessdaily.com)
Nebraska Business Daily (nebraskabusinessdaily.com)
Nevada Business Daily (nvbusinessdaily.com)
New Hampshire Business Daily (nhbusinessdaily.com)
New Jersey Business Daily (njbusinessdaily.com)
New Mexico Business Daily (nmbusinessdaily.com)
New York Business Daily (nybusinessdaily.com)
North Carolina Business Daily (ncbusinessdaily.com)
North Dakota Business Daily (ndbusinessdaily.com)
Ohio Business Daily (ohbusinessdaily.com)
Oklahoma Business Daily (okbusinessdaily.com)
Oregon Business Daily (orbusinessdaily.com)
Palmetto Business News, South Carolina (palmettobusinessdaily.com)
The articles on Timpone's websites are written by non-American freelancers who use "Anglo-sounding" pen names,[4][5]
The citation #4 does not state that. It is written in a sentence as a PREMISE, which is assuming that it is true. Given that it is printed as in an opinion personal blog, I don't see how that would carry the kind of weight required to make a bold negative reputation-impugning statement in the opening of an article in our modern-day encyclopedia. Besides, even if it was a fact in 2012 (nine years ago), which source said it is still being done today?--Lourde Mage (talk) 16:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed the sentence to be based on Timpone's statements in This American Life, retaining the mention of the year "2012". — Newslingertalk 17:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to break up the "news publishing" section into subsections for the various projects (locality labs, journatic, metric media) etc. because it is getting kind of jumbled and because metric media really seems to be the big play these days. There's a new article out in the Wash Post saying this about it. "The most extreme examples include outfits such as Metric Media — a national network of 1,300 sites that have the look and feel of local news outfits. They cover city councils and schools under innocuous-sounding banners such as “Illinois Valley Times” and the “Lansing Sun.” But a New York Times investigation last year reported that their stories were essentially propaganda, partially funded and directed by PR firms and conservative political groups in support of Republican candidates. (A company executive later called the report “patently absurd.”)" [1]Novellasyes (talk) 13:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think a separate sections for "Journatic" would probably make sense now, but the other businesses do not seem to have enough content for their own subheadings yet (see WP:OVERSECTION). If you add more information about the other businesses to the article, then more subheadings would make sense. Based on the Washington Post article you linked to, it looks like there is a lot of useful information that could go into the article. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 16:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to change the order in which the subsections appear under "News publishing" so that Metric Media comes first; separate out Locality Lab into its own section, and then have the other sections. Also, remove "news" from "News publishing" and just have it say "Publications". Whether the material IS news is something that has been contested. Novellasyes (talk) 21:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]