This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Judging from the heated discussion on the guestbook of this site ^ From The formation of the Orange Order in The Orange Order from the Evangelical Truth website
that is used as the only reference does it seem appropriate to use such a contested 'reference' #Dionysus99 17:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I have referenced up the article and added some historical accounts. I will over time add additional references and sources. I removed the blog site, and replaced the text with sourced text. I added section heads to help with the formatting. --Domer48 (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
This page needs serious work, preferably by a Hindu or a Muslim or a Shintoist, somebody who doesn't have a Catholic or Protestant drum to beat. A more propagandist article is rarely seen on the Wikipedia. Sukiari (talk) 20:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Diamond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)