Should BBY Management Be Included[edit]

Management of the Business is general fact, it does not deter from the rest of the content on the article. User LibStar suggests that it should not be included.

no, see Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Lists_of_people. stop editing as if you're working for the company. LibStar (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is BRW East Coles Survey Results Notable?[edit]

A result in the top 15-20 brokerage houses in BRW'S Annual the Deal Makers Special is by far noteworthy. Those indivduals familar with Australia's financial industry would certainly aggree.

Image copyright problem with File:Cimb logo.png[edit]

The image File:Cimb logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Recent back and forth[edit]

I would suggest with respect to the changes that keep being made, reverted and re-made

I would note to Zip1010 that, if you are an employee of this company, it is really important that you adhere to the highest standards regarding conflicts in this article. As you are aware, this article is not a vehicle for marketing. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 01:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is consensus to include the 9th place. Wikipedia articles report notable information not minor rankings. LibStar (talk) 11:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with User:Urbanrenewal, including the BRW Result provides some context and helps demonstrate the company's notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ansonrosew (talk • contribs) 11:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BBY in the Media[edit]


Agree with everything above except that I do think notability of BBY is an issue. the vast majority of these links are just mentions of BBY commenting on something and would not be able to be incorporated into the article. There is a complete lack of sources commenting on BBY. LibStar (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on BBY Ltd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categories