This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Finance & Investment Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Once all the unsourced and peacock stuff has been taken out, is this person actually notable? Can only find that one WSJ article, so I don't think there's a WP:SIGCOV argument, but might there be a WP:PROF angle, if he's done significant academic work? His Google Scholar page is here, I don't really have a benchmark as to whether those cite scores are good or not. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]