7 Summers has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 27, 2023 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Country Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Country MusicTemplate:WikiProject Country MusicCountry Music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rock music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:7 Summers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 16:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will get on with this straight away! --K. Peake 16:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

• Wouldn't soft rock be more appropriate than easy listening under genres in the infobox per the comp section?
• "and Josh Osborne and it" → "and Josh Osborne, and it" but write this out in the body in prose since everything in the lead has to be
• "on the album however following a demo version of the song" → "on the album however, following a demo version"
• "he decided to include it on the album." → "he decided on inclusion."
• Change to second single because otherwise it implies a different type
• Why is soft rock listed as an influence when the body sources it as a genre?
• "Wallen sings of a lost love of his and" → "Wallen sings of his lost love" also, the title suggestion is not directly sourced in the body
• "7 Summers received generally positive reviews" → ""7 Summers" received positive reviews" per the body
• Add a comma after music critics
• "Moi's production and the overall mood of the track." → "Moi's production, and its overall mood."
• Italicise Time and change 7th to seventh per MOS:NUM
• "The song debuted number one" → "The song debuted at number one" plus this needs to be written out in the body
• "after Garth Brooks (under the persona of Chris Gaines) did so in 1999." → "after Garth Brooks did so as Chris Gaines in 1999."
• Write the certification out in prose, also add sentences for the short film and the live performances

Background

• "what would become the songs" → "what would become the song's"
• "he announced the song would be released" → "he announced it would be released"
• Mention the writers and producers somewhere here
• "the full version"." → "the full version."" per MOS:QUOTE

Composition and lyrics

• "by soft rock bands such as" → "by soft rock bands such as the" on the img text with the wikilink
• "and bittersweet quality in the song that would" → "and bittersweet quality that would"
• "chords,[5] and layered guitars meant to give the song a maximalist element," → "chords,[5] layered guitars meant to add a maximalist element,"
• "groove" and a "breezy," → "groove", and a "breezy,"
• "are "nostalgic" "bittersweet" "wistful"" → "are "nostalgic", "bittersweet", "wistful","
• "from East Tennessee (Wallen)"" → "from East Tennessee", referring to himself."
• "indicating that a second chance with" → "indicating a second chance with"

Release and reception

• "on August 14, 2020 as" → "on August 14, 2020, as"
• This sentence is quite messy; italicise the album title, mention the release date separate for when it was released not the song and add the refs for all the info
• "Upon its release the song gained" → "Upon its release, the song was met with"
• "pack a gentle wallop"." → "pack a gentle wallop."" per MOS:QUOTE
• "Allie Clouse of The Knoxville News Sentinel deemed it" → "Allie Clouse of the Knoxville News Sentinel deemed the song"
• "would described the song as "having imagery" → "described the song as having "imagery"
• Remove the introduction to Moi
• Last para looks good!

Short film

• Img looks good!
• "with Wallen fearing that" → "while he fears that"
• "In the film after failing to make the big leagues Wallen" → "In the film, after failing to make the big leagues, Wallen"
• "to community college and by Wallen reminiscing" → "to community college, as well as by him reminiscing"
• "and the cinematic nature of the film." → "and its cinematic nature." but is three refs enough for this?
• "tease Wallen's upcoming second studio album (Dangerous: The Double Album), with Wallen stating" → "tease Dangerous: The Double Album, with him stating"
• "a January 8th, 2021 release," → "a January 8, 2021 release,"
• For the last para, [19][20] should only be invoked at the end

Commercial performance

• "on the Global Apple Music chart." → "on the global chart."
• "at number six on the" → "at number six on the US"
• The Voice part is not sourced
• "at #3 on the Rolling Stone Top 100," → "at number three on the Rolling Stone Top 100," with the pipe per MOS:LINK2SECT
• "Wallen's first single to" → "becoming Wallen's first single to"
• "driven by social media and" → "driven by TikTok and"
• The move country forward quote is not sourced and if you can, italicise the Los Angeles Times

The source/title describes Wallen as moving Country into the 21st century while primarily focusing on the song.

• [22] should solely be at the end of the first sentence

Live performance

• Retitle to Live performances
• "Wallen performed the song on Saturday Night Live to" → "Wallen performed the song on his Saturday Night Live debut to" per the source
• Either remove the "promote the album" part or add that he performed it along those other tracks
• "In his 2022, The Dangerous Tour, the song would typically be the 5th song" → "In his 2022 The Dangerous Tour, the song would typically be the fifth one" per MOS:NUM

Personnel

• Retitle to Credits and personnel
• Remove or replace Genius per WP:RSP (you are citing a lyrics page)
• Use ((spaced ndash)) so there is the right space between credits and personnel

Charts

• See MOS:TABLECAPTION and split the year-end tables

Certifications

• See MOS:TABLECAPTION

References

• Copyvio score looks somewhat high at 48.5%; cut down direct quoting to address this
• Remove amp from all URLs using it
• Music Mayhem → Music Mayhem Magazine on ref 2 and fix MOS:QWQ issues
• Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 4 and 28
• Wikilink Los Angeles Times on ref 6
• Wikilink Taste of Country on ref 8 per MOS:LINK2SECT
• What exactly makes ref 9 a reliable source? If justified, fix MOS:QWQ issues.

Replaced Source

• WP:OVERLINK of Knoxville News Sentinel on ref 10
• CS → CountrySwag on ref 13
• Pipe Time to Time (magazine) on ref 14
• What exactly makes ref 16 a reliable source?

Holler Country is a fairly large digital Country Magazine that has a full editing team and regularly breaks news

• Ditto for ref 17, which I cannot access at the moment

I included this to support the song being considered one of his best. I can remove it you feel it is unreliable

• WP:OVERLINK of Billboard on ref 21
• Cite last name followed by first and pipe Variety to Variety (magazine) on ref 24
• Wikilink TMZ on ref 25
• Fix MOS:QWQ and MOS:CAPS issues with ref 26
• Remove the author and GlobeNewswire News Room → GlobeNewswire on ref 27
• Wikilink The Hollywood Reporter on ref 29
• What exactly makes ref 30 a reliable source? If kept, cite The All-New 98.9 THE BULL as publisher instead and fix MOS:QWQ issues.

It's the radio station he did the performance on

• Remove or replace ref 31 since setlist.fm is not reliable

Done

• Remove or replace ref 32 per WP:RSP

Done

• WP:OVERLINK of Rolling Stone on ref 41

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; the sources are the main problem here. --K. Peake 20:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Kyle Peake I believe I have fixed everything, let me know if I missed anything. Newtothisedit (talk) 03:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  ✓ Pass now, everything has been covered properly here! --K. Peake 07:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]