Former good article44 Bulldog was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 22, 2021Good article nomineeListed
April 26, 2021Articles for deletionRedirected
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:44 Bulldog/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will start this review later today! --K. Peake 17:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Background

Music and lyrics

Release and reception

Credits and personnel

Charts

References

Final comments and verdict

  • The Ultimate Boss Kudos to you for the quick response, but you still need to fix certain issues:

After these are covered, this should be good to go! --K. Peake 21:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake Shit. Fixed them. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Ultimate Boss  Pass now, nest job but remember to check everything is done before ticking off! --K. Peake 06:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]