This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2003 European heatwave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I added a paragraph quoting IPCC on the causes of the deaths from the heatwave. I think it is a far more accurate than the paragraph above it, which I recommend simply deleting, as it had no citations and is now unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnvironmentExpert (talk • contribs) 18:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Cut from article:
This has nothing to do with the cause of any heat wave. --Uncle Ed 14:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
A significant connection with climate change and this event would have to be made by scientific consensus. Has the IPCC made a strong connection between the heatwave and global warming caused by atmospheric Carbon Dioxide emissions in any of its reports? A strong wind known as the sirocco often blows from the Sahara and could also be involved in this event. Does anyone have any references to published data relating to the humidity during this period that may indicate a significant connection? A scientific study may have been done that investigates this. I am unaware of the published science that other Wikipedians may be aware of relating to these phenomena, it may predominantly exist in the public domain. It must be noted that this event is frequently used as an omen of future climate change, although the science surrounding the connection has not been confirmed by overwhelming scientific consensus. --Minotaur500 12:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
The earth does not go around the sun, but around the barycenter of the solar system. Due to the large mass of Jupiter this point can actually lie outside of the sun at times, in the direction of Jupiter. When Jupiter is on the far side of the sun during the northern hemisphere summer, (making us closer to the sun than usual and thus hotter around June) I would expect France to have hot summers, eg the 2003 European heatwave.
6 years later (half a Jupiter orbit), eg 2009, when Jupiter is on the far side of the sun during the Australian summer, (making us closer to the sun than usual and thus hotter around December) I would expect the Australian summer to be warm, eg the bush fires of 2009; although much of the blame for the fires probably lies with the global warming hysterics cutting carbon emissions instead of back burning forest fuel such as leaves and twigs, thus creating the fuel the heatwave needed to become a disaster.
Astronomy programs such as Stellarium can be used to verify that Jupiter was on the far side of the sun during the 2003 European heatwave, and the 2009 Australian bush fires.
In the next few months, Jupiter will be pulling Earth away from the sun and I predict Arctic sea ice will increase (not in absolute terms, but) relative to the usual annual trend,something you can watch and veryify (www.nsidc.com) in the next six months and compare to global warming hysteric predictions such as an ice free north pole in 2008.
Crysta1c1ear (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
The statement on Italy was that 20,000 died (About 20,000 people died in Italy). That is factually incorrect and way off. From one of the referenced articles: The searing August heat claimed about 7000 lives in Germany, nearly 4200 lives in both Spain and Italy. Over 2000 people died in the UK, with the country recording is first ever temperature over 100° Fahrenheit on 10th August. http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4259
A serious effort into the sourcing of these temperatures is needed. I sourced some of the claims but had trouble on many others. Original authors would be useful in this endeavor. Ufwuct 22:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
As an Arizona resident of 100% European decent, I know that regular white people can take that sort of heat, with or without humidity (we do have Monsoon season here...) Many of these so called heat-wave deaths are actually not fully caused by the heat alone. I would like to see more of a breakdown of the age groups, health prior to death, etc in the numbers if at all possible. If any of these deaths are indeed primarily heat related, then it should be stressed that the actual cause of death is dehydration, for the purpose of educating people on dealing with high temperatures so that such deaths do not occur in the future. Zaphraud 17:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
I don't care what source 1 says: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4259 2,000 people did NOT die in the UK from the heat wave! That's almost as many as September 11th! I live in the UK, and remember it all on the news, and I know that me remembering that isn't a good enough source for an encyclopedia, but neither is this awful webpage! Check the BBC links in this article, they're all talking about record temperatures, and some people getting hit by lightning... do you not think they'd make some reference to this record approaching UK death toll?! Or that they'd at least have a link to the related story on the right side of the page? This needs some serious looking at. Steve Barnes - 24 July 2007
Yes, statistic are WAY off, but in the opposite manner. Only 141 people died in Spain? That is AMAZING! The article needs more information on how the Spanish authorities dealt with this crisis in such an effective manner! But on another section 4 THOUSAND people died! Which is it? 72.226.243.12 17:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Rachaella
The "heat map" in this article is wonderful. However, the date is not show, and it's important. The highest temperatures reached were near London, while Cornwall was quite chilly (16degC) on that same day. The map appears to show the opposite. PalestineRemembered 16:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
The mind boggles. I cannot for the life of me understand how 15,000 people in France can die in 40C. If it's hot, you drink lots of fluid - even a 10 year old knows this. I don't believe the air conditioning excuse for a second, because here in Melbourne, Australia, my grandmother lived in a retirement home which did not have air conditioning, and during our summers we have numerous 40C+ days. Nobody dies.Davez621 (talk) 12:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
--- answer: "even a 10 year old knows this". In Australia, not in France, where you NEVER meet such temperatures for such a long time, even at night. Those were old people. for you and me, it's obvious, but at 90+ they were too old to find a solution for a problem that they had never met. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.171.30.50 (talk) 02:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, people DO die in Heatwaves in Australia, even in Melbourne. In January 2009 at the time of the Black Saturday heatwave, Victoria actually recorded 374 excess deaths as a result of the heatwave. This was a 62% increase in mortality at that time. All up, around 500 deaths in Eastern Australia were attributed to that heatwave. These are reported in the report: January 2009 Heatwave in Victoria: An Assessment of Health Impacts, published by the Victoria Department of Health later that same year. Just because something didn't make the six o'clock news, it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Lesley Thomas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.192.7.245 (talk) 06:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
The numbers of dead being bandied about in this article seem prima facie highly suspicious. The way the numbers were arrived at—taking the number of dead for 2003 and subtracting the "normal" number of dead from previous years—seems extraordinarily cavalier. Half a dozen obvious objections to this methodology can easily be made.
This reminds me of specious arguments in the early 1990's concerning women and rape, when it was claimed that a third of American college women would be raped at some point during their four years of schooling. Most mainstream media reported the astonishing finding without question, not reporting that all of them were parroting a single study. That study, when examined carefully, revealed several biased questions that inflated the numbers. Subsequent studies pegged the percentage at a drastically lower number. However, mainstream press continued to report the one-in-three figure for quite some time, because it was more attention-getting.
I suspect (though cannot prove at this time) that a similar "horror inflation" is going on. The number "50,000 dead because of global warming" seems sexy, but is it true?
Comments anyone?--TallulahBelle (talk) 23:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
In 2005 Jurgen Trittin, the present leader of the German Greens Party, said the Americans got what they deserved during the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina. He said we didn't do enough to fight Global Warming therefore we did it to ourselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.47.120.21 (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
50,000 sounds like a lot but it isn't. We are talking a total population of 300 million plus, and mainly those who are already ver weak for one reason or another. Rich Farmbrough, 11:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC).
I recently read an article that pointed out that a careful analysis of the event had shown that the heatwave would not have been as severe if it there hadn't been extra heat forcing caused by global warming. I'll try to find it and put it up. Cheers, Mondegreen de plume (talk) 00:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case.
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
The meaning of the table of per-département temperatures for France is unclear to me. The 4th column is entitled "Aug'03 high °C", which I take to mean "The highest temperature recorded in August 2003". The 10th column is entitled "2–13 Aug'03 high °C", which would logically mean "The highest temperature recorded between 2 and 13 August 2003". Yet in all cases, the values for the 10th column are higher than those for the 4th column, even though the former is a strict subset of the latter. Clearly I have failed to understand something, but I do not think that my reading of the column titles is a priori unreasonable. Can anyone shed light on what is happening in this table? STeamTraen (talk) 18:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
I fixed some of the death counts but I don't have time to fix it all so please someone help me out with it Mattiaoki (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved —usernamekiran (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
– "heatwave" is used by WP:RELIABLESOURCES: Met Office, NHS, The Independent, World Meteorological Organization, World Weather Attribution, BBC News, World Health Organization, The Times, World Economic Forum, Bloomberg News.
WP:CONCISION is also an element here.
On the other hand, "heat wave" is more American English. Therefore, these articles should be moved per MOS:TIES (per the consensus at this RM), as European articles are generally written closer to British English. 90.254.4.178 (talk) 09:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)