18 May 2024

• curprev 10:3210:32, 18 May 2024‎ CBDunkerson talk contribs‎ m 81 bytes 0‎ Removed protection from "HHO gas": Indefinite protection not required undo

8 May 2023

• curprev 18:5018:50, 8 May 2023‎ JJMC89 talk contribs‎ m 81 bytes −1‎ +((Redirect category shell)) undo
• curprev 17:5017:50, 8 May 2023‎ JJMC89 bot III talk contribs‎ m 82 bytes +10‎ Moving Category:Fully protected redirects to Category:Wikipedia fully protected redirects per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy undo

11 May 2020

• curprev 23:2423:24, 11 May 2020‎ JJMC89 bot III talk contribs‎ m 72 bytes +6‎ Moving Category:Protected redirects to Category:Fully protected redirects per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 May 2#Category:Protected redirects undo

3 June 2011

• curprev 15:3215:32, 3 June 2011‎ MSGJ talk contribs‎ 66 bytes +8‎ target to section, per request undo

6 May 2008

• curprev 19:0519:05, 6 May 2008‎ Happy-melon talk contribs‎ 58 bytes −8‎ rm section target undo

12 August 2007

• curprev 16:2116:21, 12 August 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 66 bytes +8‎ direct link undo

26 June 2007

• curprev 15:0015:00, 26 June 2007‎ Tizio talk contribs‎ m 58 bytes +33‎ cat undo

20 June 2007

• curprev 16:1016:10, 20 June 2007‎ Xoloz talk contribs‎ m 25 bytes 0‎ Protected HHO gas: protected redirect per DRV (if NEW material merits undoing redirect, please an admin, or request unprotection as usual) [edit=sysop:move=sysop] undo
• curprev 16:0216:02, 20 June 2007‎ Xoloz talk contribs‎ 25 bytes −15,910‎ redirect per DRV undo

10 June 2007

• curprev 23:2323:23, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,935 bytes 0‎ →‎News coverage: format refs undo
• curprev 23:2223:22, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,935 bytes +38‎ →‎News coverage: restore text - see talk for why it was removed undo
• curprev 23:0323:03, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,897 bytes +50‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:5822:58, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,847 bytes +135‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:5622:56, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,712 bytes +75‎ move santilli intro back to intro where it belongs undo
• curprev 22:5322:53, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,637 bytes −50‎ more strange text undo
• curprev 22:5222:52, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,687 bytes +491‎ Undid revision 137333611 by Tbeatty (talk) undo
• curprev 22:4722:47, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,196 bytes +493‎ →‎Properties: debunk sublimation of tungsten - so if they're getting their claim of "over 10,000 °F" from tungsten's boiling point of 10,031 °F, that's debunked, too. undo
• curprev 22:3422:34, 10 June 2007‎ DHeyward talk contribs‎ 14,703 bytes −470‎ Patent doesn't support this. blogs are not reliable. undo
• curprev 21:5921:59, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,173 bytes +12‎ →‎Properties undo
• curprev 21:5821:58, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,161 bytes −33‎ remove totallydisputed - still nothing brought up on the talk page, use normal TOC undo
• curprev 21:5721:57, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,194 bytes −34‎ →‎Properties: fix more bad formatting and grammar undo
• curprev 21:4721:47, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,228 bytes −6‎ formatting undo
• curprev 21:4521:45, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,234 bytes +226‎ add cite undo
• curprev 16:1916:19, 10 June 2007‎ JCLately talk contribs‎ m 15,008 bytes +1‎ supply missing comma undo
• curprev 01:2401:24, 10 June 2007‎ DHeyward talk contribs‎ 15,007 bytes −24‎ PAtent claims no such thing. Patent is a claim for a more efficient eletrolyzer that enhances fuel economy in normal cars. The claims are for a mechanical part, not the gas. undo

9 June 2007

• curprev 17:2517:25, 9 June 2007‎ SmackBot talk contribs‎ m 15,031 bytes +15‎ Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes undo
• curprev 16:1216:12, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 15,016 bytes −512‎ →‎News coverage: rm donations, not news reports undo
• curprev 16:1016:10, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 15,528 bytes −9‎ →‎Properties: delinking undo
• curprev 16:0816:08, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 15,537 bytes −8‎ less offensive to proponent of this scam undo
• curprev 16:0716:07, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 15,545 bytes +796‎ ref+tag undo
• curprev 16:0416:04, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 14,749 bytes +284‎ ref undo
• curprev 16:0016:00, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 14,465 bytes +12‎ attribute Santilli undo
• curprev 15:4815:48, 9 June 2007‎ Sethie talk contribs‎ 14,453 bytes +9‎ sethie thinks we need to provide someone offering "suggestions to the contrary" or remove this phrase from this sentence undo
• curprev 15:4615:46, 9 June 2007‎ Sethie talk contribs‎ 14,444 bytes 0‎ move to section below... in the intro without a context, this is just a random statement. undo
• curprev 09:1909:19, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 14,444 bytes +3‎ patent undo

8 June 2007

• curprev 23:5923:59, 8 June 2007‎ John talk contribs‎ 14,441 bytes −839‎ copyedit. Dimers means something else altogether. lose youtube undo
• curprev 23:5623:56, 8 June 2007‎ 84.87.61.22 talk‎ 15,280 bytes −17‎ observing science ignores this fantasy is not weaseling undo
• curprev 19:3019:30, 8 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 15,297 bytes −5‎ →‎News coverage: rm weasel undo
• curprev 19:2919:29, 8 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 15,302 bytes +15‎ →‎Water-fuelled car: promotion undo
• curprev 16:1516:15, 8 June 2007‎ Sethie talk contribs‎ 15,287 bytes −43‎ →‎News coverage: all of these are television programs, not a single a " popular science newspaper articles" is listed here, much less "many" undo
• curprev 12:5012:50, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,330 bytes −25‎ →‎Water-fuelled car: "covering its promotion"?? this very paragraph includes criticism in those same programs. why do you keep adding this? what are your motives? undo
• curprev 12:4612:46, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,355 bytes +80‎ →‎Water-fuelled car undo
• curprev 12:4512:45, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,275 bytes +2,029‎ restore section about water-fuelled car. this is the crux of the hoax aspect. If you still think it's OR, bring it up on the talk page. undo
• curprev 12:4112:41, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,246 bytes −1‎ →‎News coverage: "that did not comment on its veracity"? what does that even mean? undo
• curprev 12:4012:40, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,247 bytes +17‎ →‎Criticism: and this is more weasel-worded, unsourced nonsense undo
• curprev 12:4012:40, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,230 bytes +23‎ →‎Criticism: criticism sections are stupid. the entire article should be critical. undo
• curprev 12:3912:39, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ m 13,207 bytes −5‎ →‎Properties undo
• curprev 12:3912:39, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,212 bytes +1‎ special claims are made in santilli's journal article, scientific response would also be in journals undo
• curprev 12:3712:37, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,211 bytes +17‎ you can't prove a negative, and we already say that it's a hoax by association undo