7 April 2021

• curprev 04:1204:12, 7 April 2021‎ Crossroads talk contribs‎ 91 bytes −27‎ Update undo Tags: Redirect target changed Manual revert

31 July 2020

• curprev 15:1915:19, 31 July 2020‎ Xqbot talk contribs‎ m 118 bytes +27‎ Bot: Fixing double redirect to Online shaming#Call-outs and cancellation undo Tags: Redirect target changed Reverted

27 July 2020

• curprev 20:0120:01, 27 July 2020‎ Oglaz talk contribs‎ 91 bytes 0‎ false positive undo Tags: Redirect target changed Undo
• curprev 19:5919:59, 27 July 2020‎ ClueBot NG talk contribs‎ m 91 bytes 0‎ Reverting possible vandalism by Oglaz to version by Nathan2055. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3747388) (Bot) undo Tags: Redirect target changed Rollback
• curprev 19:5919:59, 27 July 2020‎ Oglaz talk contribs‎ 91 bytes 0‎ Fix target undo Tags: Redirect target changed 2017 wikitext editor

14 July 2020

• curprev 20:4220:42, 14 July 2020‎ Nathan2055 talk contribs‎ 91 bytes +28‎ Update redirect tags undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 20:4220:42, 14 July 2020‎ Nathan2055 talk contribs‎ 63 bytes +18‎ Update redirect tags undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

4 April 2020

• curprev 23:2123:21, 4 April 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 45 bytes −2‎ ←Changed redirect target from Destination page to Online shaming undo Tag: Redirect target changed
• curprev 23:2023:20, 4 April 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 47 bytes −3,670‎ Merged content to Online shaming#types. See Talk:Merge Call-out culture in Online shaming undo Tag: New redirect
• curprev 22:0022:00, 4 April 2020‎ Grayfell talk contribs‎ 3,717 bytes −44‎ Undid revision 949138903 by 92.97.229.43 (talk) Editorializing. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 21:4221:42, 4 April 2020‎ 92.97.229.43 talk‎ 3,761 bytes +44‎ added details on another side effect of cancel cultirr undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

2 April 2020

• curprev 22:5422:54, 2 April 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 3,717 bytes −82‎ →‎See also: Remove POV see also. The see also section is excessive for an article that is barely more than a stub. undo

1 April 2020

• curprev 00:0100:01, 1 April 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 3,799 bytes −226‎ We cannot cite a statement of fact with unattributed opinion from a publication no one has ever heard of. undo

31 March 2020

• curprev 23:5923:59, 31 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 4,025 bytes −268‎ Remove masters thesis citation as per WP:SCHOLARSHIP "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence" undo
• curprev 23:5623:56, 31 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 4,293 bytes −138‎ →‎Description: A random post-grad thesis doesn't cut the mustard as per WP:SCHOLARSHIP "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence" undo
• curprev 23:5323:53, 31 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 4,431 bytes −363‎ →‎Description: And who is John McDermott? Can't find much about him online, his opinion (which has not been stated as his opinion) is undue. undo
• curprev 23:5023:50, 31 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 4,794 bytes −451‎ →‎Description: Was going to add "Time Magazine columnist Sarah Hagi..." but then I realised she's just not noteworthy enough to make her opinion due. undo
• curprev 10:0210:02, 31 March 2020‎ 136.228.172.74 talk‎ 5,245 bytes +21‎ →‎Description undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 March 2020

• curprev 23:4223:42, 25 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 5,224 bytes −33‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 23:4223:42, 25 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 5,257 bytes −108‎ Indeed, that is opinionated language. As many articles note, most "cancelled" celebrities careers continue unimpeded. undo
• curprev 06:4206:42, 25 March 2020‎ Davide King talk contribs‎ m 5,365 bytes −5‎ ce undo

22 March 2020

• curprev 14:0114:01, 22 March 2020‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 5,370 bytes +48‎ Dating maintenance tags: ((CN)) undo
• curprev 13:4013:40, 22 March 2020‎ Ajfweb talk contribs‎ 5,322 bytes +18‎ No edit summary undo

15 March 2020

• curprev 23:3623:36, 15 March 2020‎ Unreal7 talk contribs‎ 5,304 bytes −2‎ No edit summary undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 19:3219:32, 15 March 2020‎ DIYeditor talk contribs‎ 5,306 bytes −841‎ we had previously decided to remove examples, and this is not cited to any reliable sources undo
• curprev 19:1019:10, 15 March 2020‎ Jmorale99 talk contribs‎ 6,147 bytes −4‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 19:0919:09, 15 March 2020‎ Jmorale99 talk contribs‎ 6,151 bytes +161‎ →‎References undo Tags: nowiki added Visual edit
• curprev 19:0519:05, 15 March 2020‎ Jmorale99 talk contribs‎ 5,990 bytes +684‎ I added an example of call-out culture, to allow for visualization of this concept. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 02:0602:06, 15 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 5,306 bytes −11‎ →‎Scholarly Descriptions undo
• curprev 01:2601:26, 15 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 5,317 bytes −1,260‎ →‎Controversy: All relies on an unreliable source. Who is Francesca Duchi? As far as I can see she is an unpublished undergrad. undo
• curprev 01:2201:22, 15 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 6,577 bytes −1,809‎ Reverted to revision 945603643 by DIYeditor (talk): You need to take it to talk before reinstating (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 01:2001:20, 15 March 2020‎ Kevinliu1 talk contribs‎ 8,386 bytes +1,809‎ I fixed the passage a bit to try and limit the amount of bias and subjective speak. I feel as a modern example would benefit this article as it allows readers to realize the effects it can have in the real world, as well as demonstrating its validity/applicability in modern cultural jargon. The NYT is a wikipedia approved source.  undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 00:5100:51, 15 March 2020‎ DIYeditor talk contribs‎ 6,577 bytes −1,861‎ →‎Famous Examples: undue weight to one obscure example. picture adds nothing to illustrate article. undo

14 March 2020

• curprev 23:5423:54, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 8,438 bytes +3,132‎ Undid revision 945590562 by Bacondrum (talk) Our edits are for a school assignment due tomorrow, can you please describe why you undid these? Our edits are beneficial to the article, since call out culture is a controversial subject and there is scholarly evidence that support this It is beneficial to understand the usage of the subject like James Charles he still has a large following but has significant losses from called out. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 23:0423:04, 14 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 5,306 bytes −51‎ →‎See also undo
• curprev 23:0323:03, 14 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 5,357 bytes −3,132‎ Reverted to revision 945556354 by Mwanner: James Charles has his own article, this all reads as opinion, Charles currently has 16.4 million online followers, so he's hardly been cancelled anyway. This is an article about a neologism, not any particular celebrity's complaints about online abuse. (TW) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 22:3622:36, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 8,489 bytes 0‎ readjusted image of James Charles to fit the subheading undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 22:3522:35, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 8,489 bytes +1,259‎ included subheading of controversy, with a description of call out cultures controversial facets and included scholarly article undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:5521:55, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 7,230 bytes −37‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:5421:54, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 7,267 bytes −71‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:5121:51, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 7,338 bytes +8‎ added wikipedia commons approved photgraph undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:4321:43, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 7,330 bytes +11‎ →‎Description: changed the title of Description to scholarly description, since "description" may confuse readers with the main heading of definitions. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:3821:38, 14 March 2020‎ Vha407 talk contribs‎ 7,319 bytes +176‎ Inserted photograph of James Charles as a visualization for the reader undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:1820:18, 14 March 2020‎ Kevinliu1 talk contribs‎ 7,143 bytes +1,786‎ Added a new example of someone who has been "cancelled", along with two sources. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 18:4918:49, 14 March 2020‎ Mwanner talk contribs‎ m 5,357 bytes −7‎ Remove "either". Looks like someone removed and either x or y thing but "either" got left behind. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 18:0618:06, 14 March 2020‎ Jackson593 talk contribs‎ 5,364 bytes −4‎ I seperated the "Call-out culture" definition from the definition of "Cancel culture" undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:0904:09, 14 March 2020‎ M2sh22pp1l talk contribs‎ 5,368 bytes +430‎ Undid revision 945458619 by 2600:1008:B11C:CFDF:8D37:F504:BA1E:737B (talk) cited claim, no reason given for removal undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 02:3802:38, 14 March 2020‎ 2600:1008:b11c:cfdf:8d37:f504:ba1e:737b talk‎ 4,938 bytes −430‎ →‎Description: Removed dubious claim undo Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

10 March 2020

• curprev 06:4506:45, 10 March 2020‎ Piotrus talk contribs‎ 5,368 bytes +24‎ →‎See also undo
• curprev 06:4106:41, 10 March 2020‎ Piotrus talk contribs‎ 5,344 bytes +7‎ if they boycott they are no longer active fans undo