03:5703:57, 2 January 2022diffhist0 m
Brahmavihara
The cited source only mentions four immeasurables (apramana), so moving in order to keep citation close to the material, as described here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Keeping_citations_close
5 October 2021
22:0222:02, 5 October 2021diffhist−29 m
Big Buck Hunter
Removed ambiguous language. The way it was phrased, it was unclear whether shooting bucks or does would cause the game to end prematurely. That it ends the turn is mentioned in the Gameplay section, anyways.Tag: Visual edit
09:5409:54, 8 November 2020diffhist−17
Nation of Islam
Criticism and reception sections always go towards the bottom of wikipedia articles, and likewise should go towards the bottom of the lede. They at the least should not be the third and fourth sentences, before even covering the basic history of the organization. Furthermore they were place in the flow of the story about the history of the organization such that they made that story disjointed and hard to follow.Tag: Visual edit
03:0003:00, 3 March 2018diffhist−95
Model–view–viewmodel
There was no source given for this claim and it sounded like original research. Did the original author mean they derived historically from MVC? If that's the case then I'd agree but I'd also say there needs to be a source to make that claim. Or did the original author mean they derive conceptually from MVC? I'm not sure. MVVM and PM are similar to MVC but don't depend on it for their description. Either way there should be some source or it is potentially original research.
04:0704:07, 8 December 2017diffhist+20
Divinity: Original Sin
claim is not cited so I added a "citation needed" tag. It was in the lead but there was nothing similar in the rest of the article so I moved it to the criticism section.
6 April 2017
14:4214:42, 6 April 2017diffhist−73
Kibibyte
It is redundant to state that kibibyte is a multiple of 'byte' since we also state it holds 1024 of them. Also the word 'quantities' is redundant for a similar reason. Kept the same meaning, and largely the same text, while reducing the amount of words.
06:0306:03, 16 October 2016diffhist−1,243
Tree traversal
Much of this material was repeated elsewhere in the article and not cited. I kept everything that wasn't redundant and made some minor style edits.
19:2619:26, 21 July 2016diffhist−60
Interrupt
Brought 'exception' to the beginning of the sentence to emphasize it. Rewrote a second sentence because it contained nested 'such as' and 'for examples' (was the purpose to illustrate or be comprehensive?). Feel free to edit again what I wrote.
15:5315:53, 26 June 2016diffhist+21
Airbnb
this is part 2 of the previous edit. This way I'm combining the two sentences into one, keeping all the information in both. Also the info added in this edit is found in the reference link.Tag: Visual edit
15:5215:52, 26 June 2016diffhist−155
Airbnb
Deleted a sentence which said the exact same thing as the previous sentence and was poorly worded.
21:1221:12, 4 June 2016diffhist−5
MeshLab
shouldn't have to read to end of second paragraph for definition. definition comes first in all wikipedia pages I've seen. (could improve definition, but that's a second job).