This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance. (July 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Operational excellence" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Operational excellence is a mindset that embraces certain principles and tools to create a culture of excellence within an organization. Operational excellence means every employee can see, deliver, and improve the flow of value to a customer.

This approach employs the tools of earlier continuous improvement methodologies, such as lean thinking, Six Sigma, OKAPI and scientific management.[1]

The concept of operational excellence was first introduced in the early 1970s by Dr. Joseph M. Juran[1] while teaching Japanese business leaders how to improve quality. It was formalized in the United States in the 1980s in response to "the crisis" among large companies whose market share was shrinking due to quality goods imported from Japan.

Key components

There are five key components fundamental to operational excellence, illustrated in Juran's Model, that lead to better business results and cultural excellence.[1]

The first component, an integrated management system (IMS), consists of a framework of processes and standards that define where the organization is going, identify the risks to getting there, mitigate them, manage change, and continuously improve. Having one single, integrated management system reduces overlap, redundancy, and conflict. Early adopters of this practice have been companies such as Exxon and Chevron utilizing Operations Integrity Management System (OIMS)[2] and Operations Excellence Management Systems (OEMS),[3] respectively.

The second component, a culture of operational discipline, is commonly described as doing the right thing, the right way, every time. This culture is built upon five guiding principles developed from the United States Nuclear Navy, a high reliability organization. Those principles are integrity, questioning attitude, level of knowledge, watch team backup, and formality. These values are used to identify the behaviors expected of each and every employee and how they support the organization's mission and outcomes.

The Juran model

The core components principles of Juran’s model for operational excellence are as follows:

1. Grasp Juran's guiding principles[4] that lay the foundation for excellence.

2. Move your culture from thinking about quality as a product attribute (little q) to quality as a great customer experience (Big Q).

3. Understand when and how to engage leadership and the workforce to drive performance.

4. Build an effective and efficient change infrastructure using the appropriate tools and methods.

5. Drive business process effectiveness and agility.

The Shingo model

The Shingo Institute, an organization that awards the Shingo Prize, has identified ten "Guiding Principles in the Shingo Model" as forming the basis for building a sustainable culture of organizational excellence:[5]

  1. Respect every individual
  2. Lead with humility
  3. Seek perfection
  4. Assure quality at the source
  5. Flow and pull value
  6. Embrace scientific thinking
  7. Focus on process
  8. Think systemically
  9. Create constancy of purpose
  10. Create value for the customer

Flawless execution (FLEX) methodology

This section contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (November 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The FLEX methodology, also known as PBED (Plan-Brief-Execute-Debrief), is an iterative IMS originally developed by fighter pilots. Adapted for business practice in 1998, it shares some elements with Agile software development. The methodology emphasizes adapting strategies based on real-world influences, primarily through a process known as debriefing, which is central to its approach. Debriefing in this context promotes a 'nameless and rankless' culture, focusing on objective assessment and solution development regardless of one's position in an organization.

The methodology consists of four main steps:

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "What Does Operational Excellence Look Like?". Juran. 2020-08-05. Retrieved 2021-12-07.
  2. ^ "Learn about the Operations integrity Management System at ExxonMobil". ExxonMobil. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  3. ^ Affairs, Chevron Policy, Government and Public. "OEMS". chevron.com. Retrieved 2017-12-07. ((cite web)): |first= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ "The Juran Model". Juran. Retrieved 2021-12-07.
  5. ^ "The Shingo Model". The Shingo Institute.