In mathematics, Kuratowski convergence or Painlevé-Kuratowski convergence is a notion of convergence for subsets of a topological space. First introduced by Paul Painlevé in lectures on mathematical analysis in 1902,[1] the concept was popularized in texts by Felix Hausdorff[2] and Kazimierz Kuratowski.[3] Intuitively, the Kuratowski limit of a sequence of sets is where the sets "accumulate".

Definitions

For a given sequence of points in a space , a limit point of the sequence can be understood as any point where the sequence eventually becomes arbitrarily close to . On the other hand, a cluster point of the sequence can be thought of as a point where the sequence frequently becomes arbitrarily close to . The Kuratowski limits inferior and superior generalize this intuition of limit and cluster points to subsets of the given space .

Metric Spaces

Let be a metric space, where is a given set. For any point and any non-empty subset , define the distance between the point and the subset:

For any sequence of subsets of , the Kuratowski limit inferior (or lower closed limit) of as ; is

the Kuratowski limit superior (or upper closed limit) of as ; is
If the Kuratowski limits inferior and superior agree, then the common set is called the Kuratowski limit of and is denoted .

Topological Spaces

If is a topological space, and are a net of subsets of , the limits inferior and superior follow a similar construction. For a given point denote the collection of open neighbhorhoods of . The Kuratowski limit inferior of is the set

and the Kuratowski limit superior is the set
Elements of are called limit points of and elements of are called cluster points of . In other words, is a limit point of if each of its neighborhoods intersects for all in a "residual" subset of , while is a cluster point of if each of its neighborhoods intersects for all in a cofinal subset of .

When these sets agree, the common set is the Kuratowski limit of , denoted .

Examples

Properties

The following properties hold for the limits inferior and superior in both the metric and topological contexts, but are stated in the metric formulation for ease of reading.[4]

Kuratowski Continuity of Set-Valued Functions

Let be a set-valued function between the spaces and ; namely, for all . Denote . We can define the operators

where means convergence in sequences when is metrizable and convergence in nets otherwise. Then,

When is both inner and outer semi-continuous at , we say that is continuous (or continuous in the sense of Kuratowski).

Continuity of set-valued functions is commonly defined in terms of lower- and upper-hemicontinuity popularized by Berge.[6] In this sense, a set-valued function is continuous if and only if the function defined by is continuous with respect to the Vietoris hyperspace topology of . For set-valued functions with closed values, continuity in the sense of Vietoris-Berge is stronger than continuity in the sense of Kuratowski.

Examples

Properties

Epi-convergence and Γ-convergence

Main articles: Epi-convergence and Γ-convergence

For the metric space a sequence of functions , the epi-limit inferior (or lower epi-limit) is the function defined by the epigraph equation

and similarly the epi-limit superior (or upper epi-limit) is the function defined by the epigraph equation
Since Kuratowski upper and lower limits are closed sets, it follows that both and are lower semi-continuous functions. Similarly, since , it follows that uniformly. These functions agree, if and only if exists, and the associated function is called the epi-limit of .

When is a topological space, epi-convergence of the sequence is called Γ-convergence. From the perspective of Kuratowski convergence there is no distinction between epi-limits and Γ-limits. The concepts are usually studied separately, because epi-convergence admits special characterizations that rely on the metric space structure of , which does not hold in topological spaces generally.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ This is reported in the Commentary section of Chapter 4 of Rockafellar and Wets' text.
  2. ^ Hausdorff, Felix (1927). Mengenlehre (in German) (2nd ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
  3. ^ Kuratowski, Kazimierz (1933). Topologie, I & II (in French). Warsaw: Panstowowe Wyd Nauk.
  4. ^ The interested reader may consult Beer's text, in particular Chapter 5, Section 2, for these and more technical results in the topological setting. For Euclidean spaces, Rockafellar and Wets report similar facts in Chapter 4.
  5. ^ For an example, consider the sequence of cones in the previous section.
  6. ^ Rockafellar and Wets write in the Commentary to Chapter 6 of their text: "The terminology of 'inner' and 'outer' semicontinuity, instead of 'lower' and 'upper', has been foorced on us by the fact that the prevailing definition of 'upper semicontinuity' in the literature is out of step with developments in set convergence and the scope of applications that must be handled, now that mappings with unbounded range and even unbounded value sets are so important... Despite the historical justification, the tide can no longer be turned in the meaning of 'upper semicontinuity', yet the concept of 'continuity' is too crucial for applications to be left in the poorly usable form that rests on such an unfortunately restrictive property [of upper semicontinuity]"; see pages 192-193. Note also that authors differ on whether "semi-continuity" or "hemi-continuity" is the preferred language for Vietoris-Berge continuity concepts.

References