Submission declined on 24 November 2023 by BuySomeApples (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has not been edited in over six months and qualifies to be deleted per CSD G13. Declined by BuySomeApples 6 months ago. Last edited by BuySomeApples 6 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
|  |
| Submission declined on 24 November 2023 by Asilvering (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Asilvering 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 6 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 3 November 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 3 November 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 October 2023 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 October 2023 by Qcne (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Qcne 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 October 2023 by Timtrent (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Timtrent 7 months ago. | |
Comment: Note that the article was completely re-written to be about the company rather than its founder after the decline notices. Ca talk to me! 23:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability: The ghanaweb source reads like a pure puff piece, the third source has no depth of content about the subject. KylieTastic (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: The references consist of interviews with the subject, some with commentary, and gossip column-like material, coupled with apparent churnalism. It requires complete re-referencing in order to move forwards. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Maison Yusif is a fragrance house headquartered in Accra[1]. It was launched by Ghanaian perfumer, Yusif Meizongo Jnr[2]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.