Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,444 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · James Robertson (software engineer) (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Bing, Wikipedia) · Submitted 18 days ago by Camdenmaine (talk: D · +) · Last edited 18 days ago by Camdenmaine

James Robertson (1944) is an Australian software engineer and author specializing in requirements analysis. He is a lead developer of the Volere requirements method^[1] and Volere Requirements Templates^[2]. He is a Member of The Atlantic Systems Guild.^[3]

Published works

Robertson is author or co-author of the following works:

• Business Analysis Agility: Delivering Value, Not Just Software with co-author Suzanne Robertson, Addison-Wesley Professional; 1st edition (November, 2018)^[1]
• Mastering the Requirements Process with co-author Suzanne Robertson, Addison-Wesley Professional; 3rd edition (August, 2012)^[4]
• Requirements-Led Project Management with co-author Suzanne Robertson, Addison Wesley Professional (August, 2004)^[5]
• Adrenaline Junkies and Template Zombies: Understanding Patterns of Project Behavior with co-authors Tom DeMarco, Peter Hruschka, Steve McMenamin and Suzanne Robertson, Dorset House (March, 2008)^[6]
• Happy to Work Here: Understanding and Improving the Culture at Work with co-authors Tom DeMarco, Peter Hruschka, Steve McMenamin and Suzanne Robertson. New Atlantic (2021)^[7]
• Complete Systems Analysis: The Workbook, the Textbook, the Answers with co-author Suzanne Robertson, Dorset House; 1st edition (January, 1998)^[8]