.mw-parser-output .hidden-begin{box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;padding:5px;border:none;font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .hidden-title{font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .hidden-content{text-align:left}@media all and (max-width:500px){.mw-parser-output .hidden-begin{width:auto!important;clear:none!important;float:none!important))You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (October 2011) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the German article. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Albert Kalthoff]]; see its history for attribution. You may also add the template ((Translated|de|Albert Kalthoff)) to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.

Albert Kalthoff (5 March 1850, Barmen – 11 May 1906, Bremen) was a German Protestant theologian, who along with Emil Felden (1874–1959), Oscar Mauritz (1867–1959), Moritz Schwalb (1833–1916) and Friedrich Steudel (1866–1939) formed a group in Bremen, named the Deutscher Monistenbund (German Monists League), who no longer believed in Jesus as a historical figure.

Biography

Kalthoff criticized what he regarded as the romanticist and sentimental image of Jesus as a "great personality" of history developed by German liberal theologians, including Albert Schweitzer who noted Kalthoff in his work The Quest of the Historical Jesus.[1] In Kalthoff's views, it was the early church that created the New Testament, not the reverse; the early Jesus movement was socialist, expecting a social reform and a better world, which was combined with the Jewish apocalyptic belief in a Messiah. Kalthoff saw Christianity as a social psychosis.[2] (Per Arthur Drews, The Denial of the Historicity of Jesus in Past and Present - see the section on Kalthoff)[3] Arthur Drews was influenced by Kalthoff.

Bruno Bauer (1809–1882) was the first academic theologian posit the ahistoricity of Jesus. However his scholarship was buried by German academia, and he remained a pariah, until Albert Kalthoff rescued his works from neglect and obscurity. Kalthoff revived Bruno Bauer's Christ Myth thesis in his Das Christus-Problem. Grundlinien zu einer Sozialtheologie (The Problem of Christ: Principles of a Social Theology) and Die Entstehung des Christentums, Neue Beiträge zum Christusproblem (The Rise of Christianity).

Quotes

The Rise of Christianity
AuthorAlbert Kalthoff
Original titleDie Entstehung des Christentums. Neue Beiträge zum Christus-problem. (How Christianity arose. New contributions to the Christ-problem.)
TranslatorJoseph McCabe
PublishedLondon: Watts & CO.
Publication date
1904
Published in English
1907
TextThe Rise of Christianity at HathiTrust

Works

References

  1. ^ Schweitzer, Albert (1911). The Quest of the Historical Jesus: A Critical Study of its Progress From Reimarus to Wrede. Translated by W. Montgomery (Second English ed.). London: Adam & Charles Black. pp. 293, 313–318. OL 7061203M.
  2. ^ Enfant Terrible im Talar - Albert Kalthoff (1850-1906) Johannes Abresch - German text Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Arthur Drews, The Denial of the Historicity of Jesus in Past and Present 1926 - See chapter on Kalthoff
  4. ^ Kalthoff, Albert (1907). "Was There An Historical Jesus?". The Rise of Christianity. Translated by Joseph McCabe. London: Watts. p. 28.