Edit request on 18 September 2013[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please delete the empty cell after ((impossible)). kwan-in (talk) 05:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Legoktm (talk) 05:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators → Template:Sockpuppet investigations indicators – This one is almost used as template in several template documentations. Relisted Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC) kwan-in (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there is only one transclusion, nothing else uses it as a template, so it is inappropriate to have this in TemplateSpace, as it is a single-use-template. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edit request on 16 July 2014[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please list the template ((Blockedandtagged)) in the "case decisions" section. Passengerpigeon (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 23:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose to merge Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Indicators into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators. I think the both articles represent exactly the same content. Is there any particular reason why the two articles should be kept separate? --180.64.230.38 (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser is deprecated, it may be best at this point to keep them separate. --Bsherr (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would probably just slap a ((historical)) on it and be satisfied with that --Trialpears (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and simply redirected the RfCU version to the currently maintained version. Mz7 (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]