Rarely used RCAT. Almost all of the redirects tagged with this RCAT are redirects to sections about particular countries in annual Eurovision contest articles. Additionally, the instructions are contradictory: the RCAT says it is for topics that "do[] not meet notability requirements to warrant [their] own article[s]", but then says that it should be tagged with ((R with possibilities)) if the topic could be notable. All of these redirects can be sufficiently handled by ((R to subtopic)) and, as appropriate, ((R to section)). voorts (talk/contributions) 21:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:Asian Saga with Template:James Clavell.
Other than the characters and the video game, all articles are already at the target, so could easily merge. --woodensuperman 14:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per nominaton. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- How would you mark what's part of the Asian saga? This currently seems incompletely represented in Template:James Clavell. With an asterisk? 2A02:8071:184:4E80:0:0:0:4372 (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Weak Oppose characters and video games are important and the organization of the template makes navigation easier. Far superior for navigating within the subject.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The proposal is to merge, not delete, there is substantial duplication and redundancy and all links can easily be included in one navbox. --woodensuperman 08:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I always think that separate templates are preferable for works media franchises. Admittedly, with only one works template, it is hard to clarify my thoughts. I always prefer separate franchise template than bastardizing the authors works template to include a lot of things that are not really his works.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- We're only talking about three character articles. --woodensuperman 08:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette (Let's talk together!) 22:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think a merge is fair here. Izno (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused as the maps were removed from their article's infobox. Gonnym (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused as code was moved to Lua here. Gonnym (talk) 09:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Infobox pool player/rankings
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused since 2022 when removed here. Gonnym (talk) 09:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine with me to remove. I'm working on doing something with WikiData as we speak. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.