Template:Snooker season points/2020/2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Some other template appears to be preferred to this one. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I read that documentation, but it appears that nobody has decided to use this template. The page at Snooker world rankings 2020/2021, which would probably be the page to use it, uses plain text inside tables. Should we redirect this template subpage, as was apparently done (without discussion?) at ((Snooker season points/2019/2020)), or just delete it? It can be recreated if it is needed, by copying and modifying one of the other year subpages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think the templates should be deleted just yet. These ranking articles are going through a bit of a transition: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Snooker#Merge_ranking_point_season_lists. I don't know quite what the plans are for the templates. They may be adapted into the merged lists, they may be not, so personally I would just redirect them to the parent template for now: ((Snooker season points)). If they are phased out completely then they can all be binned in one go. Betty Logan (talk) 00:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Let's not keep templates based on unlikely specualtion. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, but allow for undeletion if it is needed in the future. Frietjes (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Lists of Rolling Stone Top 100 number-one songs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused sub-template of Template:Village pump page header. Gonnym (talk) 08:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:SubatomicParticle/symbol
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused as Template:Subatomic particle has been changed to use a module. Gonnym (talk) 08:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No need to keep abandoned, overwritten forms. -DePiep (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Virgin Trains color
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused rail templates. Creator said they were from a failed conversion effort. Gonnym (talk) 14:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Administrative Units of Albania
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. I checked half a dozen of the articles listed here, like Frashër, and they all use more specific navboxes for the relevant municipality. Categories are also divided in the same way (see Category:Administrative units by municipality in Albania). This navbox does not appear to be usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Big navbar (373 articles) with a rather loose relationship between the linked articles (all administrative units of the same type within Albania). The existing (and used) navbars by county and by municipality are much more useful. Markussep Talk 11:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:GitLab
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Template created in 2020; no edits to the page since then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:House of Elis 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. Unclear where this template would be used. Created in 2017 with many edits, and then apparently abandoned. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:House of Habsburg after Ferdinand I
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. Navboxes, including ((House of Habsburg after Ferdinand II)) and ((Austrian archduchesses)), appear to have superseded this sidebar. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Jct/Chinissai
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. If this template is usable, someone should document it and, ideally, transclude it somewhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Map of Wales
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Appears to have been created for a WikiProject task force that has not been active since 2014, so it is probably not usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Mass rape
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. The more comprehensive ((Violence against women)) sidebar appears to be preferred on relevant articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:NextArchive
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. Created in 2009. Two discussions about it from 2009 say that it was no longer working at that time. It appears that people have figured out how to navigate between /Archive pages using other means. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. This is a roster navbox for a seventh-tier English football team, which (I think) means that most of the players will not be notable enough to have their own articles. There is a good roster at Nuneaton Borough F.C.#Players, and current players with their own articles will have links to the team's page from their infoboxes, from their article's lead, or both. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - navigates between 7/8 blue links, so is valid. GiantSnowman 15:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per GS, although it could do with checking/updating as I think a couple of these players no longer play for the club. I also fixed the "no transclusions" issue by adding it to pertinent players' articles (no idea why this had not been done before). It is perfectly standard for such templates to exist where there are sufficient blue linked players. The argument "current players with their own articles will have links to the team's page from their infoboxes, from their article's lead, or both" would suggest that all such templates should be done away with, as the above applies to all clubs, but I can't see that ever happening...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per GS and Chris. It's quite unclear to me why editors keep including "No transclusions" as a valid reason to list deletion. --SuperJew (talk) 19:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions. Appears to be useful only on two articles about the district and the town, but it does not appear to be wanted there. If articles for the mandals are created at some point, this navbox could easily be recreated. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Population change
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Created in mid-2020. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Peacock inline. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:Peacock inline with Template:Peacock term.
This redirect was removed in 2019 but there really is no reason to have two templates for this. Seeing as how the banner is Template:Peacock, Template:Peacock inline should probably be the inline version name. The categories will also need updating. Gonnym (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 22. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Express Entertainment TV Programm
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Double with Template:Express Entertainment TV The Banner talk 19:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and consider deleting Template:Express Entertainment TV too, as a sea of red interspersed with occasional links to dabs and unrelated articles such as Honeymoon and Ghalib. Certes (talk) 00:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Tennis wfsq cell
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, abandoned project (context) Letcord (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Sfnp/date
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Based on the discussion at Template talk:Sfnp/archive 1, it appears that this subpage's functionality was merged into the parent template in 2011. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:TR male profile
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unused external link template for a website (www.tenisromania.ro) that is unofficial, out of date, broken, and contains no data not available on the official ATP, WTA and ITF tennis websites which we have widely-used external link templates for. Letcord (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Tennis player timelines
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These timelines duplicate info already in prose and tabular forms in player season articles, e.g. 2011 Novak Djokovic tennis season. They are also difficult to understand at a glance, and those with text become completely unreadable on narrow screens as the text merges over itself. Consensus was found to delete three of these in a recent discussion. Letcord (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).