The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Navbox for a single page. Izno (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agreed, there is only one farming simulator page and not many other articles to link to. --AquaDTRS (talk) 01:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the navbox clearly isn't aiding in navigation. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 15:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only has two links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:14, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Death metal
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Fb rbr header Arsenal 12-13
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Ua league grid start(16)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Delete per nom Hhkohh (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Infobox commander in chief
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to ((Infobox official post)). Used in a grand total of 5 articles. Officially abandoned as the creator (and only ever user) has left the project and asked to be blocked. No useful documentation; the /doc page isn't just a skeleton, it's a paste job that doesn't even get the name of the template right. Kramler (talk) 14:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; not necessary. Jc86035 (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: superfluous. - theWOLFchild 14:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; Redundent and unneeded. Garuda28 (talk) 15:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In most cases the commander-in-chief is a role/power/duty vested in an office and not a own office. In these cases the official post infobox does apply because:
According to Wikipedia itself an incumbent is the current holder of a political office; the commander-in-chief is not an office
A military is not a department
The infobox is missing a parameter that explains in which office the commander-in-chief role is vested.
@Colonestarrice: That doesn't even make sense. You seem intent on creating pages that you think are interesting to you, but of no value to Wikipedia. You've already shown that page creation stats are important to you, but you need to put the interest of the project ahead of your ego. - theWOLFchild 15:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ohh the irony, says the person that supports the deletion of the "Office of the President (Austria)" article, although you never worked on Austria-related articles and seem to be generally uninvolved in AfD discussions. This looks like a purely personal thing to me, but then I'm the one that should put the interest of the project ahead of my ego. And when exactly did i say that "page creation stats" are important to me? What doesn't make sense in my comment? "You seem intent on creating pages that you think are interesting to you, but of no value to Wikipedia" this is a very offensive and daring accusation. Colonestarrice (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Colonestarrice: Wow... so my !vote is "personal"? In other words, it wasn't about deleting another one of your needless pages (which the community deleted btw.), it was about you...? Talk about "irony". And "accusations". (And didn't you recently complain about a page move that made it appear someone else created the page instead of you?) Anyway, sorry to break it to you, but I just don't care about you that much. Or your useless pages. Don't accuse others of being "offensive and daring" while you yourself are being offensive and hostile at the same time. Focus on edits, not editors. - theWOLFchild 15:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete above keep not convincing. Infobox officeholder is used for all kinds of offices including other military ones; there's no particular demonstration that this military office is special in needing a separate infobox; don't see that one parameter is enough for a seperate infobox Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:WikiProject Lowell, Massachusetts
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
delete, we don't need wrappers for every permutation of parameters. Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Previously
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).