February 1
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was userfy. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Virginia Slims of Akron tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Also nominating Template:Virginia Slims of Fort Lauderdale tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Tennis templates without any entries. The tournament articles don't exist. ...William 21:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Templates now have an entry.--Wolbo (talk) 23:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Navboxes exist to navigate between linked articles on related subjects. A good rule of thumb is whether the navbox includes a minimum of five links to existing articles on related subjects. This navboxes includes one year-specific tournament, and one non-year-specific parent article, and three red links for non-existent year-specific tournament articles. That is not enough to justify this navbox's existence. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy until the articles are created. (I'll take them if nobody else requests them, and would then speedy delete them if we don't turn all the years blue soon, as they can be undeleted/recreated later, if needed. If someone else wants them, though, I won't complain.) 4 blue-linked years are enough for these navboxes, in my opinion. —PC-XT+ 10:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - PC-XT, I know this is TfD and not AfD, but given the extremely brief character of these articles, I would think a better alternative would be to merge the four years into the parent article, thereby creating a complete history and list of the four years this tournament existed. Something for Wolbo and WikiProject Tennis to consider. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, we would need to look the articles and their sources over, and determine what to do. If merged, we obviously wouldn't turn the years blue any time soon, resulting in a change of my !vote if this is still open, or speedy deletion if it was userfied in my space in the meantime. I'll start a topic on WT:TENNIS. —PC-XT+ 17:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, can be handled by "see also" links. Frietjes (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Infobox Toho character
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Infobox Toho character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- weak delete, the articles are currently using hard-coded table-based infoboxes (e.g., see articles in Category:Toho Monsters). however, seems like most could be replaced by ((infobox character)) directly, as I have done in Godzilla. Frietjes (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Nashville Star 6
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Nashville Star 6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. No other season has a template. Most of the bluelinks are unrelated people, and most of the redlinks will never have a chance, especially given that one first-placer from a previous season doesn't even have an article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Adelaide Bite roster 2010-11
Template:Perth Heat roster 2011-12
Template:ADO Den Haag roster
Template:Australia women's (baseball) roster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Australia women's (baseball) roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
merged with Australia women's national baseball team. Frietjes (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:New South Wales Patriots roster
Template:Melbourne Aces roster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Melbourne Aces roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
out of date, unused, and duplicates roster in 2012–13 Melbourne Aces season. Frietjes (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Brisbane Bandits roster 2012-13
Template:Adelaide Giants roster 1998-99
Template:Canberra Cavalry roster 2013-14
Template:South Australia roster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:South Australia roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
out of date and unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:2009 Victoria Aces roster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:2009 Victoria Aces roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2009 South Australia (baseball team) roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
single use template which I merged with the articles (Victoria Aces, South Australia (baseball team)). Frietjes (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Age in years, months, weeks, days and hours
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deprecate. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:Age in years, months, weeks, days and hours (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Not used, and probablty will never be. The nature of this template is needlessly specific, and I think the other Age calculation templates will suffice. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 13:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It is very relevant and useful for spacecraft etas where there is a countdown to the second. I think code was embedded into other templates at some point in which case this template should be marked as deprecated rather than deleted. I would have preferred seeing this rather than a nomination. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 10:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps deprecate for now per A Certain White Cat, as I don't expect there is much use for it, now, but I am currently unsure. —PC-XT+ 11:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- deprecate for now, and reconsider at a later date. Frietjes (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Deprecate per White Cat. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.