< September 9 September 11 >

September 10

Template:Emmerdale Character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. However, move isn't really necessary. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Emmerdale Character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. All the job is done by ((Infobox Emmerdale character 2)). After deletion we can rename ((Infobox Emmerdale character 2)) to ((Emmerdale character)). Magioladitis (talk) 10:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:D&D VG character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy deletion due to a request by this template's only substantial author (CSD G7). Jesse Viviano (talk) 17:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D&D VG character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is now only used on one article, Minsc. It duplicates the in-universe attributes available in ((infobox D&D character)), which isn't necessary, because the D&D infobox is fully capable of being used for the article instead. Part of a general cleanout of category:general VG character subboxes in preparation for changes to the ((infobox VG character)) code. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.