Avidhomebuilder (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Report date November 4 2009, 19:47 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• DetmanUSA (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• EastCoastDean (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• AssociatePh (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Experiencedsenior (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• OZSimplicity007 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Experiencedearth (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• CAChefprof (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• PatDaisyFlowers (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Autoproonline (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Hu12

Use of wikipedia as a vehicle for advertising and promotion for "Adsense pub-5611770590014180" related sites. See Spam case.--Hu12 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )

Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Hu12 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

• All  Confirmed, for what it's worth. No obvious sleepers lurking. Short rangeblocks may be possible if things get bad, but bearing in mind collateral would probably be ill-advised. – Luna Santin (talk) 09:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

• All blocked and tagged. NW (Talk) 23:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.