The main problem with the article is the choice of references. Many of them are from self-published type sites, travelogues, bible discussions, blogs, etc. Scroll down in the article to see what I termed "dubious" references. Any suggestions?

@Efrat (talk) 06:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate some feedback on this article I've written.

Freudianr (talk) 13:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this article suitable for Wikipedia?

Batesj91 (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just created a new article on the Gell-Mann and Low and, this being my first substantial contribution to Wikipedia, I would appreciate some feedback from people knowledgeable on the subject or experienced editors.

Pandisv (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Garland is a goof and I need you to enjoy this.

Yungnoha (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted this article today and there is a box appearing at the top of it saying that it is an "unreviewed" article. I would like to have the article reviewed/verified by editors so that this box can be removed. Thank you, Ailson.

Alisonstapleton (talk) 23:00, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me as I am a first time author. I love this group and would love to link the bands and link the principles to their own distinct Wiki pages ie Mike D, etc.

Thank you and love this site. Kurt.

Kurtnardone (talk) 23:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]