Hello, I've attempted to create an entry for the Grand Luxxe Residence Club brand. I would appreciate any feedback you have as I have attempted to adhere to the guidelines.

Edyang (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just created a Song List for singer Mohammed Rafi under the name List of Songs by Mohammed Rafi. I have used the same reference as used by List of songs by Elvis Presley i.e. the song listings at Allmusic.com so hope this is considered a reliable reference. Request feedbacks. ClintonSS 07:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

ClintonSS 07:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

• Looks good to me - I've copy-edited the lead a little, and dropped in a couple of wikilinks. You might want to go to his main article and somehow refer to this article, via a "See also" section or ((further)) link, if you haven't already. Ma®©usBritish ^[talk] 10:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have created a page on a new langauge learning exchange site and would appreciate any feedback.I would like to know if I have included all the core issues and if there is anything I should change.

Rwellmanns (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded this entry on U.S. acrobatic gymnast Dylan Inserra with more complete citations, an infobox and added categories. I would appreciate a review of the article, especially to determine whether the "bare URLs" box at the top of the article can now be removed. Thanks!

Seandalytx (talk) 12:54, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, looks okay, will remove. Cheers, Ma®©usBritish ^[talk] 13:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this new article on Museums Australia, the peak industry and professional body for museums in Australia

Otherthinker (talk) 14:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks like it might be promising. I personally don't know anything about that type of article, however, I would strongly recommend you visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Museums who might conduct Peer Reviews and help you shape the article further and take it in the right direction. Ma®©usBritish ^[talk] 10:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. Going there now.Otherthinker (talk) 12:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need some one to review this article.I would appreciate any feedback you have as I have attempted to adhere to the guidelines.

Namelessguy83 (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems like a long and in-depth lead section, then jumps into his Discography as the first section after the TOC. Maybe break the Lead into a Background section and maybe one or two more sections like Career, then thin it out per WP:LEAD which advises that the Lead is more a summary of the article. Ma®©usBritish ^[talk] 13:40, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up

• Article seems to have been copy-edited and organised much better now. Lead looks right length now, with text put in sections. Ma®©usBritish ^[talk] 13:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Created a new article about the game Super Kid Icarus, could you please review for me? Thank you in advance.

PeterAmbrosia (talk) 16:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added an infobox and wikified the terms in this entry for U.S. rhythmic gymnast Julie Zetlin. I would like to request review of the article and evaluation of whether it's appropriate to remove the wikify box. Thanks!

Seandalytx (talk) 17:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia essay on how to limit wikibattling. I'm posting this here to get feedback.

Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I was wondering if I can get some feedback and suggestions for my wikipedia article on Montgomery & Co. Thank you!

Wilshire100 (talk) 19:19, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I have copy-edited this, quite a bit in some places, just to smarten it up.
• 140 refs.. sheesh, someone's been busy! However, whilst those many refs account for what the company does, you need to account more w=for what it is in terms on notability. See WP:CORP which details what type of sources are needed to show a company is notable - independent reviews, reports, documentaries, press releases, etc - I'm sure a company with a portfolio that long is bound to have some, and referencing will strengthen the articles case to stand, rather than coming across as promotional, which more often than not leads to deletion - given the amount of work there, please keep it on your userspace for now before moving it to mainspace, and cover WP:NOTABILITY as much as possible. Some of those first sections on Early history, etc, are good places to provide such info, or better still cite some of the information in those sections, as there is no source provided until mid-way through "Early 2000". See WP:RS on what wiki considers a "reliable source". I think if you cover these points, and remain objective, by avoiding making the article look like an advert for the company, you should be fine.
• Photo of offices isn't working.

Thanks, Ma®©usBritish ^[talk] 14:34, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my article.

I have made a page about Darrell Calkins, a lecturer, writer, and life-coach, as I value his work and the knowledge of it to the general public, and no page has been created about him before.

Bambooforest12 (talk) 21:26, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this good? Just rate my page please. I need some feedback.

Micklan (talk) 21:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on the readiness of this article for public posting would be appreciated.

Eve Pettit (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like some feedback on the article about David J. Marcou. I rewrote the article from before and will edit it after comments from others are reviewed.--Dacorbandit (talk) 00:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dacorbandit (talk) 00:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The original article was deleted in January 2011 - I don't see a Sandbox or subpage on your user space, just a Bio on your talk page. I can't see anything notable in it, to be honest, but you really need to create a proper sandbox and get it laid out so it is more readable as an article, before a RFF can be done properly. Ma®©usBritish ^[talk] 10:48, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for feedback on the article. At this point I will not proceed much further with the article. Your feedback was honest and I am not that good in moving around in WK. Sincerely,Dacorbandit (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]