The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The Party Party (Netherlands) → Party of the Future  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect was previously nominated back in February 2021. However, the redirect was not tagged, and the discussion was relisted but never transcluded to its corresponding log page (likely due to a glitch caused by the XfD closer) and thus the discussion was lost and never closed. So, I thought it would be a good idea to bring it back to RfD, and to somehow resume what was started in the previous discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. After Feb 21, the article 2021 Dutch general election contains this redirect, and the target mentions the subject. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per Shhhnotsoloud. — Ætoms ^[talk] 09:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters#TSR 2104 – MC3 – Monstrous Compendium – Forgotten Realms Appendix. WP:ATD (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Struthiomimus (Dungeons & Dragons) → Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at redirect. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• It was never mentioned at its target even when it pointed to Dinosaur (Dungeons & Dragons) (before that was, in turn, redirected). All this title ever accomplished was to make it harder to find Struthiomimus. Delete. —Cryptic 02:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters where it is mentioned. I don't see why the existence of a redirect with a qualifier in parentheses should make finding the primary topic any harder. Daranios (talk) 09:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• (M.A.) → Master of Arts  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 12#B.A., all of these redirects to degrees are in question. However, this one was overlooked in that nomination, and the addition of parentheses is perplexing to me. I think it should be outright deleted. BD2412 T 20:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep I can see this being used as a title after a person's name, ie John Locke (M.A.)^[a]. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• That would be poor formatting, though. For consistency, such a link should be John Locke (M.A.), not John Locke (M.A.). BD2412 T 00:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I meant that it could possibly be used as a search term; I agree it shouldn't be linked from articles. Still a weak keep. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 00:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: unusual formatting and rarely used. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This just doesn't seem to be useful given the unusual nature of its formatting. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:38, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete: while it could be potentially used it is unlikely and the unusual formatted makes me choose deletion over keeping. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Hemoglobin (My Flag Red) → Lil Wayne albums discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Lil Weezy Ana → Lil Wayne
• New Orleans Nightmare 3 → Lil Wayne
• Young Money Billionaires → Young Money Entertainment

No mention of these Lil Wayne mixtapes at target articles or elsewhere on Wikipedia. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Sean Flynn. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Sean Flynn (actor) → Zoey 101#Cast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This actor has appeared in multiple films and TV programmes, so the redirect is inappropriate. In addition to Zoey 101, he appears in (among others) Zoey 102, Devious Maids, The Last of Robin Hood, and the Family Guy episode "Road to Europe". I have no opinion on whether he warrants an article, but if he doesn't, the page should remain a redlink. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. This redirect has gotten a ton of views in the last 30 days (over 20,000), and is likely overlinked right now, which is just as likely to cause confusion as the redirect’s existence for use in search. Without knowing all the rules around redirects or making a comment on whether he warrants an article, my thought is that minimizing links to this page and retargeting to List of Zoey 101 characters is a potential solution, as this page provides information on the actor’s most well-known character and a redirect would lead users directly to this information, rather than the current redirect which forces another click to get there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelwallace22 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Sean Flynn This could also refer to Sean Flynn (photojournalist) who was an actor for a time, although he was better known as a photojournalist. The line *Sean Flynn (actor), American actor on Sean Flynn should be changed to something along the lines of *Sean Flynn (actor, born XXXX), American actor known for Zoey 101 which would then create a way for him to be linked and have it at the DAB page in compliance with WP:DABRL. I put born XXXX as I couldn't find a WP:RS for his birth year, so a different disambiguator might be desired. TartarTorte 16:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore article. It was deleted via WP:PROD back in 2017 and he has since become more notable. It was a typical barely-notable actor bio with 3,648 bytes. A few sentences of prose, a list of credits, and three sources (none of which are that great, including seanflynn.org). However, it'd make a good foundation to be updated with his new roles. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk pages of suggested targets List of Zoey 101 characters and the dab page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore article per User:Tavix. BD2412 T 20:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd support a restoration if someone (Tavix?) was willing to put some time into the article. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Sean Flynn per TatarTorte above, without prejudice to someone creating an article on this actor at a further-disambiguated title. That will avoid foisting the work of creating/updating the article on others who don't want to do it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Sean Flynn per above and tag as ((R from possibilities)). CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 14:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Proteus bavaricus → Olm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention in article the actual scientific name of the Olm is Proteus anguinus and not Proteus bavaricus Qwv (talk) 12:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an extinct species in the genus Proteus. ([1]) And since there is only one extant species in Proteus, the genus is covered at Olm. I'll see if I can draft an article. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Far be it from me to wave the consistency flag, but, Edward-Woodrow, you are actually going against the notability guidelines for paleo-species here :) Individual paleo-species do not get separate articles unless there is an unusual amount to say about them; rather they are covered at the genus level (which in this case also covers the only extant species). This goes double for dubious classifications, as this seems to be acc. to the source. Further, I question the wisdom of creating some kind of weird hybrid redirect-article mutant at the redirect while this is being discussed. In summary, I'd suggest that a mention at Olm and a redirect are indicated. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Sorry for the inconsistency. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No mention has yet been added to the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, include something like Edward-Woodrow's draft (thanks for that!) at Olm#Taxonomic history, and point there. Daranios (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Done Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).