The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Islamist poster in Cardiff.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 2D works are not covered by UK FoP exemptions, However there is a fair use argument as the poster is used to support commentary on the ideological position presented. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:31, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tsgovtlogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Governmental logo? Are Indian ones exempt? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Indian government copyright is 60 years from publication - uploader is also unlikely to be the copyright owner. ww2censor (talk) 09:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:This is logo of Shagun films private Limited.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Film company logo, Not necessarily uploaders own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen Latifah Hollywood Star.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Who holds the design rights in the Hollywood stars? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and move to commons: there does not appear to be any copyright issues with this considering all these c:Category:Hollywood Walk of Fame stars. ww2censor (talk) 09:29, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It says CC-BY-ND on Flickr, which is not a free licence. Permission from the photographer is needed. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jesus Corona Celebrating a goal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This photo proves that the uploaded photo should be dated September 12, 2015, so the date listed here is wrong. The EXIF data is not at all reassuring, as it does not demonstrate ownership. The uploader has also uploaded unambiguous copyright violations,[1][2] so all of the uploads are suspect. Binksternet (talk) 21:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.