The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michelle Stilwell, Legislative Image Oct 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EXIF: "Copyright holder: J.Yanyshyn/VisionsWest Photography" Eeekster (talk) 00:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• That's consistent with the copyright notice I found on the BC Legislature website here, which notes "Selected images on this site: © John Yanyshyn, Visions West Photography." And otherwise the notice even says that the government itself claims copyright...so the PD tag on the image seems incorrect either way. Works of the Canadian government (and of its provinces/territories) appear to be protected by a form of crown copyright rather than public domain like works of the U.S. federal government. postdlf (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mtadamstumala.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image has a watermark indicating its origin. Eeekster (talk) 04:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egyptian military intelligence management and reconnaissance.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright holder would be the Egyptian Government or military surely? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that the uploader is currently blocked on Commons for repeatedly uploading non-free files. postdlf (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:๋JWDongmuaenglogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a logo design with a seperate copyright, It may be the uploaders representation, but it's a derivative work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simorklogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative design of football club logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Revert to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palace Station.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• When I uploaded this it was fair use, I think we just have to undo the changes by IP 2602:306:ce9a:860.... Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Revert to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 17:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suncoast Hotel and Casino.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It should be noted that the uploader originally stated this as a fair use claim. Going by comments here on PUF by Graeme Bartlett what we are dealing with is a serial license changer. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 19:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Revert to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 17:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunset Station logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of origanility concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• When I uploaded this it was fair use, I think we just have to undo the changes by IP 2602:306:ce9a:860.... Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Revert to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 17:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Texas Station logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• When I uploaded this it was fair use, I have undone the license changes by IP 2602:306:ce9a:860.... Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: There is no consensus that the image isn't below the threshold. TLSuda (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Easyday logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• It looks to be below the threshold, just text and three small identical shapes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Change to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emporia Public Schools USD 253 logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Looks OK now with FUR added, I have deleted a previous revision. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Change to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graton Resort & Casino logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• I uploaded this under ((logo fur)) and someone later changed it to ((PD-textlogo)). If the consensus is that it doesn't qualify for textlogo, it can simply be reverted to this version. Toohool (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I reinstated FUR. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Change to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jewelry television logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• The only non-text item is a generic heart symbol. I can't see this being anything other than PD-textlogo. postdlf (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• A fair use rationale could be easily added for this anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was originally, and I had replaced it with PD-textlogo, then Sfan00 IMG posted this here. So let's discuss the merits of that. postdlf (talk) 22:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:REFIt.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern on OS logos. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image seems to be in the Public Domain. TLSuda (talk) 12:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regarding the Pain of Others.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This appears to be a book cover Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, it is. And...? What specifically about it might be copyrightable in your view? The picture on the cover is public domain, and so if we ignore that, we'd have a text-only cover image. postdlf (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• It is public domain, do to it being an old image, with some simple text added. No changes are needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 AFC Asian Cup Official Match Ball.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is product artwork, which may be subject to a seperate copyright status. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Change to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 12:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:27 KSNT logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern, given the inclusion of the 'peacock' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure if it would've been free or non-free since it was different from the other version. I'll change it back. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 14:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stan Trauth holding a Collard Lizard in th Ozarks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Taken from Faculty website, exact same resolution. Unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, taken by Joy Trauth on my camera. How does she verify that I can use it? Thanks. I tried to do a similar thing a while back and as far as I can tell, it was never delt with and I gave up (a different picture).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Herpetology2 (talk • contribs)
  • You or the copyright holder needs to fill out the form at WP:CONSENT and email it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • sent instructions to Joy Trauth 2-7-2015, will send sometime this week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herpetology2 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleted. On Commons as File:Stan Trauth holding a Horned Lizard in Utah.jpg with OTRS. --MGA73 (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stan Trauth with David Attenborough on the set of Life in Cold Blood in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source photo gallery (here) claims all photos taken by Joy Trauth. Unlikely to be uploader. --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)\[reply]
• * Yes, taken by Joy Trauth on my camera. How does she verify that I can use it? Thanks. I tried to do a similar thing a while back and as far as I can tell, it was never delt with and I gave up (a different picture). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herpetology2 (talk • contribs)
  • You or the copyright holder needs to fill out the form at WP:CONSENT and email it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and then add ((OTRS pending)) to the file. --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sent instructions to Joy so she can email 2-7-2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herpetology2 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleted. On Commons with OTRS. --MGA73 (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruce Bury.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Taken directly from USGS profile, unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. Although hosted on a US Government website, there is no evidence that ((PD-USGov-Interior-USGS)) applies, as it may not be the work of a government employee serving in official capacity. --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • • contacted bury to verify copyright issue. I do not believe there will be one. I am pretty sure I took this photo, but he will remember! I met a lot of these people while attending some meetings they attend. Its not worth taking a chance, it might have been his daughter. There were some photos taken by other people and I seem to have lost record on this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herpetology2 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.