The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arena da Baixada.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• FUR and license tag conflict. Eeekster (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. FYI, it's Star Wars: Battlefront II, a decidedly non-free product. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hypori.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be game screenshot - no source, ergo no ability to check (c) status Skier Dude (talk) 05:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - The House of the Dead III. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grudgezombie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• same as above -same uploader Skier Dude (talk) 05:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tara.Iyer.IND.Tennis.Player.abc123.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Professional quality and staging. No metadata. Uploader has had issues with text copyvios. Danger (talk) 05:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giffoni Kids.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned, no source, watermarked as (c) 2006 IAFF Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decordova1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two Big Black Hearts by Jim Dine, 1985, at the DeCordova Museum. No FOP in USA for statues. MGA73 (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - see my comments below regarding the "publication" of these statues. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stoneysradioface.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The looks of the picture and the text "taken from radiothon footage" makes me think that this is a screenshot. MGA73 (talk) 12:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wojoeats.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The look of the file and the text "taken from radioathon" makes me think this is a screenshot. MGA73 (talk) 12:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. I am willing to go along with the de minimis argument here. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angel Crest Cemetery Porter County Indiana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• According to List_of_cemeteries_in_Porter_County,_Indiana Angel Crest Cemetery is from 2004 to present so the statue is probably new. No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 12:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm going with keep as this appears to be de minimis. The photo is of the cemetary, not the statue. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bowie Caboose Plaque Dec 08.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a plaque and I believe that the plaque is copyrighted. MGA73 (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cloquet Moose Fires map P7120308 map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the map. Who made it? Is it still copyrighted? MGA73 (talk) 13:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, as it seems that it's most likely PD. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MellonParkFountain.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Text says "The park was established in 1943" so this may be a "new" fountain. No FOP in the US for statues. MGA73 (talk) 13:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does it look "new" to you? That statue is from the grounds of the "former estate of Richard B. Mellon," which was constructed in 1912. That statue is certainly PD by now.--GrapedApe (talk) 15:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I can't tell if it is from 1943 or 1912 just by looking at it. And why is it "certainly PD by now"? --MGA73 (talk) 17:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been there a few times, and I don't remember if there are any indications of when the fountain was built or who designed it, but it looks to be older than 1943 in my opinion. I don't know, but those gardens were definitely there before the park was donated to the public in the 1940s. I can't find any information about when the fountain was made online, but I did find an article regarding when the fountain was fixed so that it could work again in 2009. I went there soon after it was fixed, and saw it working (unfortunately, the water causes green algae to grow on some of the sculptors). About the restoration work, the article says, "It also returns several historical elements from the garden's 1929 design by Alden and Harlow for the Richard B. Mellon estate." According to the park's website, Alden and Harlow designed the gardens in 1912. It would be a shame to lose that picture for Wikipedia, in my opinion, because I think the fountain is probably the most interesting thing about Mellon Park. I mean, if you go there, it's basically a relatively small city park with trees and a gate, and then a hill goes up to a little plateau-like area with a clearing, and then the main focus goes to the old garden area which leads right up to the fountain - which is basically the focal point of the park. The old mansions seem kinda walled-off from the "park" part of the park itself by trees and gates and hillsides, and the parking lot area. I think that the old garden area, with the fountain as the central focal point, is really the heart of Mellon Park. Leepaxton (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I wrote to the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy about the fountain in Mellon Park, and this is the message I got in reply:

"Lee,

Many thanks for your inquiry. Included below is the pertinent information you are looking for regarding the sculptural fountain in Mellon Park:

In 1929, Mellon chose Vitale and Geiffert, a premier design firm of the Country House Era, working in collaboration with Gilmore D. Clarke, to redesign the Walled Garden. The garden is enclosed on the two sides with tapestry brick flanking a Gothic wall of limestone. Niches in the end wall once held sculptures of the seasons by Edmond R. Amateis (1897-1981), who also created the sculptural fountain.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any additional questions you may have.

All the best,

Bill Ferguson

Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy"

The above message seems to indicate the year 1929, though I found a website (here) about Mellon Park that says, "Dating to 1935, its Walled Garden is a classic work of landscape architecture by Vitale and Geiffert, containing sculpture by Edmond R. Amateis." Another website (here), which may have been influenced by the previous site, says, "The garden, which dates back to 1935..." Then, there's this photograph on flickr listed "Circa 1935" which shows the fountain, and this 1930s-era Mellon Park Plan which shows the area where the fountain is located. In the Excerpt about the Walled Garden's Layout, it says, "In 1929 a formal, walled garden was designed by Vitale and Geiffert for the area to the west of the house (Figure 11.10)." It doesn't say much about the fountain, but it does go on to say, "In the 1935 photos... potted plants were set out on the paved patio between this fountain and the central limestone and brick wall." In the Excerpt about the Walled Garden's Design, it says, "The issue of Country Life for December, 1934, carried an article, "Renaissance Garden," which gave an illustrated account of the walled garden on the estate of R. B. Mellon in Pittsburgh." It goes on to say, "The magazine account credits the firm Vitale and Geiffert working in collaboration with Gilmore D. Clarke for the garden's design, while Edmond Amateis is named as the sculptor of the three bronze figures that were included in the scheme, and Samuel Yellin is credited with the fine wrought iron grills and gates." It doesn't mention the fountain there, but later it mentions different ideas and plans for the garden "ranging from March through November 1929" and "two alternative schemes being considered". The fountain is not mentioned, but a little later, it goes on to say, "A comparable choice between two design proposals marked the development of the far, western end of the garden. The built arrangement of fountain (designed by Amateis), fountain pool, and terrace was preferred over the construction of a large garden shelter..." "The appearance of this garden is documented not only by the illustrations in the magazine article of 1934, but also more amply by two privately owned sets of photographs of the property taken in 1931 and 1935." "The photographs taken in the full summer of 1935 preserve the image of an exceptionally lush, densely planted garden and estate (as seen in Figure 1.7)..." "Figure 1.8 shows the central lawn of the walled garden in 1935, and reveals that the two flanking rows of flowering cherry trees had been reduced to one tree on each side of the lawn toward the fountain terrace." This does not seem to provide a clear date as to when the fountain was built, but it was definitely there in 1935, and probably there in 1934, and maybe even there in 1931. The wall around the fountain was designed in 1929, and probably built soon after that (I figure the wall may have been there in 1930, and was most likely there by 1931). The fountain was probably added not long after the wall around it was built, but exactly when we do not yet know. I will write back to Bill Ferguson of the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy and see if he can try and find out any more information about the fountain. Leepaxton (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I wrote back to Bill Ferguson of the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy today with the above information, and this is the message I got in reply:

"Lee,

I have been informed that the fountain was designed and built in 1927 by Edmond R. Amateis. Am currently awaiting documentation that will support this date, but wanted to send you a quick note in the meantime.

Thanks,

Bill"

I will post more information when I receive it. Leepaxton (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • So, unless Amateis registered the copyright and continued to renew it in the interim, then the sculpture is PD.--GrapedApe (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• comment - see my comments below regarding "publication" of the statue. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I received a message from Bill Ferguson of the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy yesterday, and this is what he said:

"Lee,

We are in the process of obtaining feedback from the City, so I will keep you posted.

Thanks again,

Bill"

Leepaxton (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • I think we're all pretty comfortable Magog's point about the fact that if there's no clear date on the statute (as noted by Bill Ferguson the park employee), then it's got to be ((PD-US-no notice))--because if there had been notice the date of the sculpture would be manifestly clear to Ferguson.--GrapedApe (talk) 04:45, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nelson Co Confederate Mem Dec 08.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The statue was erected in 1965. No FOP for statues in the US. MGA73 (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - there is debate that erection of a statue may be considered "publication" in the US; if so, quite likely ((PD-US-no notice)). Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Sculptor died more than 70 years ago, so in any case, it would appear to be PD. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:35, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jamescottstatutebelleisledetroit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP for statues in the US. Who made this? When did creator die? Any other information that could make this PD? MGA73 (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - According to this, the sculptor is Cass Gilbert. ((PD-US-unpublished)), or given other copyright provisions, almost certainly ((PD-US-no notice)) or ((PD-US-not renewed)) (sculpted ~1925). Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. While I admit I'm not an expert on these matters, one would think that permanently installing it in a public place in 1908 would count as "publication", and that would make it PD-1923. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MacombstandingguardoverWashingtonBlvd Detroit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No FOP for statues in the US. Who made this? When did creator die? Any other information that could make this PD? MGA73 (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - according to this, it was released to the public in 1908, and according to this, the sculptor was Adolph Alexander Weinman. Again, this rests on the definition of publication. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RussianPassport.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Contains copyrighted logo. Might not be free. Also, unused. Sreejith K (talk) 13:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which logo is copyrighted? this one is CC-BY-SA-2.0, implying the coat of arms isn't copyrighted (or copyrightable) --My another account (talk) 14:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sign at Seljalandfoss.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. No FOP on Iceland. MGA73 (talk) 14:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: old version deleted, new version with copyrighted part smudged out uploaded by me, because I think the photo is still useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LowerWoodwardHistoricDistrict.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Only FOP in the US for buildings. Derivative work of the sign/map. MGA73 (talk) 14:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:HistoryofGeashill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland. MGA73 (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 3696w.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG Dargan5410w.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the painting. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:41, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG DelganyBurialGround0705.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG Jamestown2833.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG OPWsignDelvin1778.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG SaggartNote4902c.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG SaggartNote4903e.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is made in stone so it may be different from the other PUF-files listed here. --MGA73 (talk) 14:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made a notice on Commons to get more comments. --MGA73 (talk) 15:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG SaggartNote4905c.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG SaggartNote4907e.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG SignAtBrownshill.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG ValleyoftheDogsTurlough.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This does not seem to be "painted". So it may be different from the other PUF-files listed here. --MGA73 (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PaulorFiaac.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the sign. There is FOP in Ireland but it does not always cover D2 works - see Commons:COM:FOP#Ireland MGA73 (talk) 14:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:College Park Aviation Museum Sign Dec 08.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The photo is a derivative work of the poster. FOP in the US covers buildings. MGA73 (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandusky Plaque.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The photo is a derivative work of the sign/plaque. FOP in the US covers buildings. MGA73 (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:FaygoRedPopcan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Text and design of the can looks to complex to be PD-text or PD-ineligible MGA73 (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: see #File:LowerWoodwardHistoricDistrict.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:29, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Profootballhalloffame USFL areas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The 2 pictures may make this an unfree derivative work. MGA73 (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - FoP Canada doesn't cover 2D works anyway: commons:Commons:FOP#Canada. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WindsorBldgwithAfricanCanadians.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the painting/photo on the wall. Not sure where the building is located but often 2D works are not covered by FOP. MGA73 (talk) 17:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schiller ststue Belle Isle detroit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the statue. FOP in the US is valid for buildings but not statues. Does anyone know the artist and when (s)he died? MGA73 (talk) 17:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Herman Matzen died in 1938. Statue was done in 1908. http://www.flickr.com/photos/71288712@N00/391530198/
• Cool. Then the file is moved to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 06:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Building - St. Anselm's Pink City Sr. Sec. School.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Self Published image appears on the School's website at http://www.anselmspinkcity.com/about.html so possible not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 17:58, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crystal cove sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• US FoP does not cover complex sculptural or mural like works which is why this image of a sign has been reffered to PUI. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Familyforce5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EP Cover art unlikely to be CC license. Eeekster (talk) 19:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cinema Stars Mural.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is clearly a 2D artwork, and thus only permissible under 'fair-use', the image here is currently unused. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• No objection. It is not being used. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palms Chamber Map 1948.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a letterhead/map, as such the 1948 date means the map show may still be copyrighted. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• No objection. It is not being used. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Technical keep - ((PD-US-no notice)). But the usefulness of the file is in question, so perhaps WP:FFD. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.