The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:India Goa TSKK Bulletin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:India Goa TSKKBulletin.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MykolaHvylovy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:MykolaHvylovyukraine.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BugisStreet027.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader with history of copyright problems. Kelly ^hi! 04:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fergal O'Hanlon poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be derivative work of presumed non-free signage. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bliss Carman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No copyright information at given source. Kelly ^hi! 07:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Larger version with less cropping here. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 01:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep per correct source information being located. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Davy Crockett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No copyright information at given source. Kelly ^hi! 07:57, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The image was uploaded nine years ago, so it's not surprising that the information isn't there anymore. Moreover, this image is of a style found in nineteenth-century artwork for printed books: you don't see this type of image in post-1922 works at all. Although much of it is cropped out, there's enough of an inscription at the bottom of the image to prove that this was created for publication; it can't have never been published. Nyttend (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Agreed. Obviously an engraving published in the early 19th century. Eastcote (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - what people might think of the style really isn't relevant, we need an author and source per WP:IUP. Kelly ^hi! 22:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Getty Images have what appears to be another version of it here - http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/3245171/ArchivePhotos - labeled "Date created: 01 Jan 1820". --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 08:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Truman poker chips.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source provides no date/authorship/copyright information. Kelly ^hi! 08:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Appears in this page - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703932904574511472981896400.html - attributed to the Truman Library, but I couldn't find it on their site. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 08:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruby-shooting-oswald.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No info on author/copyright/date/place of publication. Kelly ^hi! 08:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete That something was published in a federal government report doesn't mean it's a work of the federal government. To make that claim, one would need to have more information to verify the claim. Hekerui (talk) 00:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1982FIFAWorldCup.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of a Fair use image. multichill (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Serves no purpose anyway as it isn't even really a vectorization; it's still a bitmap embedded in the svg! See zoomed in [1] Speight (talk) 03:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ISB-Hyderabad1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt this is own work. The log probably makes it unfree anyway. multichill (talk) 10:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adlai Stevenson statue at airport.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No permission from the artist, Rick Harney, and the copyright has not expired. Also see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adlai Stevenson statue at airport.jpg multichill (talk) 11:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • So delete it already. I wasn't aware of the "fredoom of panorma" issue when I uploaded it some years ago. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winsford flash display board.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of a display. I doubt this is covered by FOP in the UK. multichill (talk) 11:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that I took the photograph of this public display board, and that the image is therefore my personal property. My understanding is that the image is mine to do with as I please, ie publish on wiki. Are you OK with this explanation? --Rhodian (talk) 09:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. While it may otherwise qualify for a fair use rationale, the source is still too problematic to use at this time. Deleted without prejudice to later restoration if the real source is found. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMS Sunfish-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is not enough information to verify where it is from. The photo looks very old so I doubt it was taken in 2005. How can we verify that it is from The Probert Encyclopaedia and that they have the copyright? MGA73 (talk) 11:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Source for this digital image is here. There's no indication of any permission at that page; however, its information is enough to justify a fair use rationale for this image, since the boat pictured was destroyed before the end of the Second World War. Nyttend (talk) 14:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nur Eddin Kahala.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It was licensed PD-Egypt-photo but that license was removed [2]. Now it has no license. We need a valid license. MGA73 (talk) 12:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Potential copyvio. File:IBC-TV.png, a picture of basically the same thing, is listed as non-free, and there is no reason to think that the image in question is free, either. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eileen Albrizio.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be professional photo. No evidence that we have permission to use it as the license describes. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:16, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GulfMedalRev.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gulf War Medal rev.png; the commons version is in use currently at Gulf Medal, and thus the image qualifies for fair use, Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.