The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:&&& Creative Marathon London Poster.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• publicity poster; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 01:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Axe3 logo 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; sourced to axe3.net; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 01:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stmarks schoolbadge.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 01:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SGCS Background image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo w/banner background; claim of "I have permission" not substantiated through WP:OTRS Skier Dude (talk 01:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sahc new art.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo/banner; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 01:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanpedrodolphins.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• fc logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 01:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sblee.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 01:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sbwfa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• fa logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 01:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sfl005.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• fc logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) Holder Skier Dude (talk 01:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharath lohi01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no source; metadata = photoshop; appears to be publicity pic Skier Dude (talk 01:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Som Ranchan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• apparently cropped (see black edges) from another source - not provided Skier Dude (talk 02:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sowcar janaki young.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• apparently an older publicity photo, but with no source, not possible to determine the correct license Skier Dude (talk 02:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Difference (album).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 02:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pendleton You by US USA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 02:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:You by Us EP Cover 2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 02:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CityOfLondonSkyline.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source, web resolution, smells like a copyvio. The Evil IP address (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FlowStone Flow.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Contains screenshots, so not nessacrily self as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:K38 Water Safety1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Badge design- NOT self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:K38 International.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo - So not nessacrily self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sadiq school map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not nessacrily self as claimed - This is a site plan Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrex1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Heraldic crest - Not nessacrily self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CK GAA Website.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused image grab of a website. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1903 Football Team.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image from 1903 being licensed with a "self" GNU and CCL 3. Same uploader used the same licenses for File:1969 Double Winners.jpg and File:2002 IFC Champions.jpg. The image was upped March 17, 2009. If the uploader was the photographer who took all these images they would be over 106 when this was uploaded. Seems more likely the got this (and the others) from the Clashmore website. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1918classphotocopy.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Class photo from 1918 licensed under GNU and CCL. The photographer and/or company who took the image has their name on this image in the lower right hand corner. I am unable to read it though. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as ((PD-art)). — ξ^xplicit 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1920Love.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 1920 Zeenut Baseball Card under "self" licenses. Appears to have been uploaded by a family member of the player on the card. That does not mean they own the copyright however and as they have not been active since 2007 asking for OTRS probably would not work. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The 1920 baseball card in the photograph/scan would be ((PD-US)), so the correct license here would be ((PD-art)). This is surely PD. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1968GreekHorsemen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Licensed under "self" but looks like a scan of, or photo taken of, a yearbook. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1971WestCatholicAllCity.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused newspaper scan/photo of a 1971 paper being claimed as "self" via CCL. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, license is wrong and as I have seen we usually delete such non free images. Off2riorob (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FvB48FAC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a football progamme dated 1948 - Cannot be self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regis4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 2D artwork- no further information given Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:43, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, OTRS received. — ξ^xplicit 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobby Tench wikipedia copyright.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image contains watermark and explicit (C) symbol Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Uploader says they sent a permissions email. —fetch·comms 01:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IvdFlaunt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screenshot / Video capture - NOT self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:InkubusPoster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional artwork for film - NOT nessacrily self as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• There are some jurisdictions where this could be covered by FOP, but since there no evidence that it was shot it one of them it'll have to go. Could presumably be tagged non-free and rationale added, if anyone cares to do that. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:57, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Like the river.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional artwork.poster for an event - Not nessacrily self as uploader claims Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weewar map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like Game footage - So NOT nessacrily self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Recsam logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot originalminigames250x167.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screenshots - NOT self as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romeo no.3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This contains marketing artwork... reffered to PUI as I wasn't sure this could be licensed as is claimed by uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The artwork itself would be ((PD-ineligible)), no? Licensing seems OK then for a self-taken picture. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.