The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garrettgos04.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be a modelling shot, already appears elsewhere on the web: http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/1166/2j2i4xt.jpg Fences&Windows 02:26, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I am also nominating all the other uploads from this user, which are all seemingly professional shots uploaded without permission with vague descriptions. I've already blocked them for copyright violations: File:Sarand04.jpg, File:Garrettgos03.jpg, File:Garrettgos02.jpg, File:Garrettgos01.jpg, File:Jamiesing03.jpg, File:Jamiesing02.jpg, File:Jamiesing01.jpg, File:AndrewVilner01.jpg, File:Andrewhack01.jpg, File:Soccerman01.jpg, File:Andymanpaint.jpg (from here), File:Andyman06.jpg, File:Andyman05.jpg, File:Andyman03.jpg, File:Andyman02.jpg, File:Andyman01.jpg, File:Austinfoot01.jpg, File:Cillact02.jpg (image of Jon Kortajarena already published widely, e.g.[1], copyright Getty Images), File:Cillact03.jpg, File:Djammo03.jpg, File:Djammo02.jpg, File:Djammo01.jpg, File:Chordstew01.jpg, File:Chord09.jpg, File:Brunolacho02.jpg, File:Kidcher.jpg, File:Jasonasianderu09.jpg, File:Yanny09.jpg, File:Johnclapton09.jpg, File:Sarand04.jpg. Fences&Windows 02:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chef Center of California location.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: The identical resolution image is sourced from this webpage and there is no evidence that the organization has given permission to use their image. The uploader claims to be the copyright holder and author but there is no evidence of this either. ww2censor (talk) 05:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: concerns rectified. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zarek1cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader affirms that this photo has been cropped, and claims cc-by-self. However, no link to the pre-cropped photo is provided, so could be non-free. Acather96 (talk) 07:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original is at the logical name of File:Zarek1.jpg and is hosted on commons. Nanonic (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexandru Ivasiuc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Can't find any evidence that photos such as this are in the public domain in Romania. Kelly ^hi! 07:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlfredDelp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photos in Germany are copyrighted for 70 years after the death of the author. Kelly ^hi! 07:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ayala Abukasis MFA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Works of the Israeli government are not in the public domain. Kelly ^hi! 08:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTRCSeal.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Cannot find any evidence that this is PD in Bangladesh. Kelly ^hi! 08:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete for lack of evidence of permission, without prejudice against restoration should the necessary evidence surface later. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bayahaym.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm not aware that work merely funded by a government grant means the work is in the public domain. Kelly ^hi! 08:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  See also File:Bayas89mABAGLomaPrietaScaled.gif. Kelly ^hi! 08:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Currently undergoing clarification with ABAG (Association of Bay Area Governments), will have info this week. Many of their images are edits of USCGS images. Leonard G. (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As with another related image file, I am seeking clarification from the source. Info will probably not be available until after the holidays. Leonard G. (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bli-Sodot stamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Works of the Israeli government are not in the public domain. Kelly ^hi! 08:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the following:

This file is in the public domain, because copy or scan of a banknote or stamp in Israel are in free use with no limitation. See: commons:Category talk:Stamps of Israel PD Public domain false false Please verify that the reason given above is valid! Note: if there is a specific licence tag for the reason supplied here, please use it.

With respect, Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 09:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scrolling down to the this section shows that probably isn't a valid claim. Kelly ^hi! 14:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Israel stamps are copyright for 50-51 years after issue per Public domain stamp templates and Stamps of Israel. ww2censor (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bluefin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source given for this image to show it is actually a work of the California government. Kelly ^hi! 08:26, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The image can be found here. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/mspcont1.asp#bluefin Gentgeen (talk) 07:09, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craxi Berlusconi.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Works in Italy generally copyrighted for 70 years after author's death. Kelly ^hi! 08:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulles Hanjour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence image is in public domain as claimed. Kelly ^hi! 09:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:HuangMengfu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The link of permission only refers to Baidu wiki, not the image which is copyrighted (© 2010 Baidu Declaration on the Rights).

3. Baidu Baidu Encyclopedia Wikipedia users in reference to self-publish the contents of the CC agreement (the "knowledge sharing"agreement, the localized version of the license agreement in China for the Chinese name of "Creative Commons 2.5 China Mainland version of agreement. " Attribution - Non-Commercial use - no derivative. See http://cn.creativecommons.org/

Sdrtirs (talk) 09:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The file is copyrighted at Baidu Baike with a reference to Creative Commons 2.5 (知识共享 2.5 中国大陆版协议). This license permits the non-commercial use, provided the source (Baike) is attributed to. These conditions are met here at WP. This is NOT an unfree file! Shenhemu (talk) 03:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia doesn't allow images with a noncommercial license. Kelly ^hi! 03:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see that now, and sorry for the misunderstanding. I will try to find another source or get permission to use. Shenhemu (talk) 01:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CVUbadge-1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• A badge produced by this generator, unclear copyright status. Acather96 (talk) 11:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:R Danushkodi Adithan.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason

This photograph has been taken by my self and there is no copyright violation. As with power of sole ownership I submit to wikipedia with the free to use license permission. Mahizhini1977 (talk) 15:07, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Periyappa - JPEG - Mini - Tiny.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This photograph has been taken by my self and there is no copyright violation. As with power of sole ownership I submit to wikipedia with the free to use license permission. Mahizhini1977 (talk) 15:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cigarettemachine-joecamel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Although the Joe Camel portion of the photo is perhaps 10% of the image, it is hardly incidental, it is the point of the photograph. I assume it must be under copyright, and not by the uploader. SPhilbrickT 16:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bjornestad Skisenter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 19:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. There is a photo in the given URL, but it's private. However, I have no reason not to believe that the photo that we are discussing is the one that is now listed as private. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tezontle wall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo not found at given source. Kelly ^hi! 21:02, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Hmm, the photo was at the given source when I uploaded it from there to Wikipedia almost 2 years ago. Since it was there and licensed under the cc-by-3.0 license at the time, it is materially irrelevant that the original flicker user has deleted (or changed the license) of their photo, is it not? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:30, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.