The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andersstone.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Painting, doubt uploader is the artist Acather96 (talk) 11:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne Edwardes (Nee Blomart).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Painting, claimed to be over 100 years old. Stated as in the Public Domain and being licensed under the GFDL. Not sure how to prove age or PD claim. Acather96 (talk) 11:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Acather96,

The original portrait in question hangs on the wall of our family home and has been in our family since the sitting in the late 1700's. Does it seriously look less than 100 years old to you!!! Why waste yours and my time....

I have been kind enough to release a piece of our family heritage to the public domain in the spirit of the Wikipedia Project and I don't need some clown tagging it for deletion.

Regards

BNShann — Preceding unsigned comment added by BNShann (talk • contribs) 06:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asahipecialcucumbers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to Asahi VIEW magazine. Claimed GFDL, doubt uploader is the copyright holder. Permission given is stated as : "For use only in media related to Asahi City, Japan" Acather96 (talk) 12:07, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penrose CCC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is a picture of a drawing by Penrose; Penrose, not the submitter, therefore owns the copyright of the original image of which this is a derivative work, making this image non-Free. To fix this, someone will need to get explicit permission from Penrose. Chronulator (talk) 15:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This falls under the derivative work category. The only way/s it could be used would be for "Penrose" to submit a permissions email to OTRS or see if this meets all 10 of the fair use policy at Wikipedia. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly film poster Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, F11. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:01, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Jujutacular (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:21, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Syncrude Mildred Lake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that the image is in the public domain - source document does not mention copyright but the ERCB site copyright statement [1] Information on this site has been posted with the intent that it be readily available for personal and public non-commercial (educational) use. indicates commercial restrictions. MilborneOne (talk) 16:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artemis Gounaki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• this page asserts a copyright by Schwarzkopf & Schwarzkopf SPhilbrickT 21:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• The image also looks a lot like this.--SPhilbrickT 21:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete: Unless it can be verified via OTRS this comes off as a blatant copyvio of this Book Cover. I just noticed the nom pointed out this link which appears to be a review of the book from 2005. The image here was upped in 2006 by "JohnBob2" without any source. There is also a version on Wikimedia Commons that was upped by "Chris" in April 2009 and lists the "source" as German Wikipedia, yet that link throws the "source" back to the Wikimedia Commons "source." Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.