The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathy house of israel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License is listed as free, however, the description indicates fair use. Thus we have a conflict, and should probably default to the more restrictive license. link redirects to last-fm, which is all (c) material. Skier Dude (talk 02:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rocks cry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License is listed as free, however, the description indicates fair use. Thus we have a conflict, and should probably default to the more restrictive license. link redirects to last-fm, which is all (c) material. Skier Dude (talk 02:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iris proverb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License is listed as free, however, the description indicates fair use. Thus we have a conflict, and should probably default to the more restrictive license. link redirects to last-fm, which is all (c) material. Skier Dude (talk 03:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iris 3script.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License is listed as free, however, the description indicates fair use. Thus we have a conflict, and should probably default to the more restrictive license. link redirects to last-fm, which is all (c) material. Skier Dude (talk 03:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unvisible sun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License is listed as free, however, the description indicates fair use. Thus we have a conflict, and should probably default to the more restrictive license. link redirects to last-fm, which is all (c) material. Skier Dude (talk 03:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos vela afc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user claims it is self made. It looks to high quality to be self made, the image also appears in this article GoPurple'nGold₂₄ 03:32, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:35, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos-vela.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The user claims it is self made but it looks to high quality to be self made. GoPurple'nGold₂₄ 03:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sayeedawarsi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• clear copy vio from the internet.. speedy delete ..

http://www.topnews.in/baroness-warsi-becomes-most-powerful-women-britain-2143763 Off2riorob (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Deleted - by User:Fastily. Thanks.Off2riorob (talk) 22:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mydvdcollection.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• A picture of a bunch of copyrighted images. When we put a DVD cover on an article for a TV show or season, it comes with a FUR for why we're using it. It's been long established that such covers may only appear on the articles for which they are relevant (so Buffy season 1 cover on the Buffy season 1 article, for example). Here there are 43 copyrighted DVD cover images, being used in userspace. Each cover needs its own rationale for why it should be used in userspace, so that's 43 rationales. It's not going to happen because fair use images cannot be used in userspace. Matthewedwards :  Chat  20:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete! Matthewedwards :  Chat  20:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since non-free images aren't supposed to be used in userspace. Also a violation of the derivative works policy. ~NSD (✉ • ✐) 22:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SteveMilovich.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Painting of Nai Shwe Kyin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 2D artwork of some sort. Likely copyrighted, as subject was born in 1913 and he is old in this painting. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and uploader not being the copyright holder. ~NSD (✉ • ✐) 22:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 00:20, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edit counter disabled time for reflection.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• @2010 Soxred93, plus various icons Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All icons are covered by the GNU license of my browser. Users on Wikimedia Toolserver do usually not make contributions in "unfree" form. Please let me know if you need more information Kipzock (talk) 21:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I endorse the GDFL/CC-BY-SA dual-licensing. Feel free to close this PUI as keep. (X! · talk)  · @943  ·  21:37, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per X!. ~NSD (✉ • ✐) 22:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - my last and only concern is the browser you're using... is it free? Otherwise the images on the browser on this image aren't free. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The browser is GNU icecat [1], with all software artwork/ design being entity free. For more details about the specific license see link. Thanks. Kipzock (talk) 18:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it's GNU, I don't know the proper derivative license. Once I know that, I'll close the PUF. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per X!.   — Jeff G.  ツ 17:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the above (Kipzock and X!). ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 22:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Since >(X! · talk) is the author of the page from which the image was taken, and X! has, as above, explicitly stated there is no issue, therefore, there is no issue. People who are not copyright owners of a given item, cannot logically create a copyright issue if the copyright holder says there is no copyright issue. The case is therefore closed at the very moment of the copyright holder stating all is well. Wotnow (talk) 07:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.