The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept OTRS recieved Skier Dude (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An obviously promotional image with commercial value, no evidence the uploader hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saved the file for web and uploaded it to the site. Should i send the original jpg with camera date and all properties listed with it?? Im not sure what information is missing on the file that i need to add. I sent a permission statement to permissions from the owners of this photograph. There has been no reply. Please advise? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falsewords333 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image is under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 liscense, description, author and source information has been added. I can add the permission statement to the image file if needed. Please advise. Falsewords333 (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)falsewords333Falsewords333 (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader, User:Robelias, claims this is his own work, and has added a public domain tag. However, I found the same image at gettyimages.com, where it is credited to Allen Einstein. [1] I should also note that, when User:Robelias added the image to Charlie Villanueva, he added the caption "Copyright 2009 NBAE (Photo by Allen Einstein/NBAE)" [2]. So, something fishy is going on here. Zagalejo^^^ 03:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after I tagged the image, Robelias uploaded a new image under the same file name. He's also claiming this one as his own, but I suspect he simply found it somewhere online. Zagalejo^^^ 06:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image contains inline credits, obviously not user-authored B (talk) 04:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very doubtful that the user owns the copyright for the Police patch for for the Anchorage PD B (talk) 05:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Users uploads are mostly false claims of copyright, according to his user page, he lives in North Carolina and has never been to Alaska. This image contains no EXIF data. I doubt this user actually took the photo. B (talk) 05:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful that this user owns the copyright to the Gaston County sheriff's office patch B (talk) 05:10, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While the badge design is presumably PD as a work of the national government, it's a 3D object and the photograph may be copyrighted. No source is given, so we have no way of knowing. B (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A composite of several images. The source is given as "Wikipedia, Other Sites". Because the individual image sources are not given, there is no way to verify that they are all CC-licensed images. B (talk) 05:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to [3], "Note that this general permission [the cc-by-3.0 license] does not extend to use of logos found on the site (e.g. the ESA logo, ESA/Hubble's logo etc.), which shall remain protected and may not be used or reproduced without prior and individual written consent of ESA/Hubble." The logo could be ineligible for copyright though, and thus in public domain. Grand Schtroumpf (talk) 10:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept per WP:AGF in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Stifle (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly (Parrot) 14:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the same files are a part of a larger photo taken by me and edited my using MS Office Picture Manager to highlight the broken part in the structure and the same is in congruence with the adjoining written material. It has been magnified and edited. Is there a problem with that? Regards, Shantanu 16:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantanu2806 (talk • contribs)

There is no metadata to prove that. Which camera did you used for it. yousaf465'

Metadata here is irrelevant in light of the above comments, if we take Shantanu at his word (which we should do per WP:AGF as we have no evidence to the contrary) then the image is legit and should not be deleted. Pahari Sahib 11:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept per WP:AGF in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Stifle (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly (Parrot) 14:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the same files are a part of a larger photo taken by me and edited my using MS Office Picture Manager to delete members of the family who were in the picture. It has been magnified and edited. Is there a problem with that? --SD 17:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantanu2806 (talk • contribs)

Sounds legit, there shouldn't be a problem. Pahari Sahib 11:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Flickr; Flickr license is for noncommercial use Verne Equinox (talk) 17:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly (Parrot) 20:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image would presumably belong to the police department, unless there was some other reason to believe that it was PD. J Milburn (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see why this image should be public domain. The copyright presumably belongs to the police force. J Milburn (talk) 20:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept w/license updated. Skier Dude (talk) 04:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Images of toys are copyrightable. See this page. J Milburn (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will change licensing to use of non-free content to show a significant change in toy construction.--Flash176 (talk) 21:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've gone back and looked at the available reasons given in the drop-down menu for non-free/fair use content and none of them apply, even though I believe it satisfies the criteria of Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Policy_2. --Flash176 (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the picture is good to go now. I found the non-free 3D art tag, and believe it applies in this case.--Flash176 (talk) 00:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept w/license as updated. Skier Dude (talk) 04:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Images of toys are copyrightable. See this page. J Milburn (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply for the above neckpost.jpg.--Flash176 (talk) 21:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the picture is good to go now. I found the non-free 3D art tag, and believe it applies in this case.--Flash176 (talk) 00:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images of toys are copyrightable. See this page. J Milburn (talk) 20:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the image and recommend deletion per the link provided by J Milburn.--Flash176 (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtfully a user-authored image, this user has uploaded numerous copyrighted images and claimed them as user-authored. B (talk) 20:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtfully a user-authored image, numerous copyrighted uploads by this user B (talk) 20:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtfully a user-authored image, numerous copyrighted uploads by this user B (talk) 20:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtfully a user-authored image, numerous copyrighted uploads by this user B (talk) 20:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtfully a user-authored image, numerous copyrighted uploads by this user B (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtfully a user-authored image, numerous copyrighted uploads by this user B (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtfully a user-authored image, numerous copyrighted uploads by this user B (talk) 20:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept} w/ license updated. Skier Dude (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence this is in the puublic domain. J Milburn (talk) 21:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The film "Five Minutes to Live" is a public domain film. Regardless of this, many film entries on wikipedia display the film's poster as part of the film's general information. That is all I've attempted to do here. I was under the impression that when a film falls into the public domain that the promotional material for that film (poster included) are then public domain as well. If not, I can always upload the title frame from the film instead. 1938superman (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The poster is in the public domain because it was published prior to 1978 without a copyright notice, per ((PD-Pre1978)). IronGargoyle (talk) 21:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Almost certainly taken from the website indicated in the watermark without permission. Stifle (talk) 21:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 21:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 21:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely uploader is the copyright holder. Stifle (talk) 21:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as self but sourced to a newspaper site Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...cause this man contribute to orang asli and fight for Orang asli land( aboriginal People of Malaysia )..More information on this website ( http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2008/9/28/lifefocus/2075609&sec=lifefocus ), (http://www.perakspeak.com/content/view/55/38/) , (http://www.coac.org.my/codenavia/portals/coacv2/code/main/main_art.php?parentID=11374493258660&artID=12263647690297) and (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXlFAuokyvg) ,(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG6RAXjDwFs&feature=PlayList&p=777C4B524D32A743&index=0) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azil14 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.