The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

watermarked with www.flightmemory.com; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 00:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

image of paperback (possibly composite (?) -unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Uploader has stated "I am not a relative of Mr. Currie's nor am I an employee of his company; I am simply someone who enjoys his books"[1], so I can't see any possible justification for the pd-self tagging. --Stormie (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

book cover, highly unlikely was released under CC license Skier Dude (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Uploader has stated "I am not a relative of Mr. Currie's nor am I an employee of his company; I am simply someone who enjoys his books"[2], no evidence whatsoever for the claimed CC and GFDL licensing. --Stormie (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, and retagged as non-free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

commercial logo; no source, unlikely released under CC license Skier Dude (talk) 01:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sourced from broadway.com - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 01:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; could be retagged as non-free, but then the image has a really bad rationale that would just be FFD'd right away anyway. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

corporate logo credited from limankoy.net - no WP:OTRS Skier Dude (talk) 03:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minimal modification of the stock photo (http://www.drobo.com/drpartners/product_images/Drobo_Left_Angle_Med.jpg) -- cropped and shadows removed. -- Wesha (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Author claims to have released it into public domain, yet the score clearly shows a 2008 copyright notice and two distinct authors: Reynaldo Vea (lyrics) and Joel Navarro (music). Uploader shows no indication that he or she has received permission to grant this work to the public domain. RJaguar3 | u | t 05:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder. See also OTRS:3598829. Stifle (talk) 18:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept w/correct size kept. Skier Dude (talk) 01:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The dimensions of this image, uploaded 4 November 2007 and 4 January 2008, are too big and therefore these files should be deleted. Their resolution is too high to claim "Fair Use" and "low image resolution". The original image is perfect. Cdl obelix (talk) 23:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it can be here like any other album cover, as long as it has detailed FUR. FotoPhest (talk) 11:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.