The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Martin 00:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for the Insertion of Random Cheese Related Content[edit]

Delete a ridiculous WikiProject that the speedy tag won't stick to. Article history says that User:MONGO says I can't nominate this because it's a WP:POINT to do so. I disagree. -Splash 02:31, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• BJAODN Roodog2k 02:33, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• leave our cheese alone not sure how this happened, but this page seems to have two different VfDs, and this isn't the one that's linked to from it's page, I suggest a merger--152.163.100.137 02:38, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• It's the half-baked redirect idea someone had to rename parts of VfD and not others. I've fixed it. -Splash 02:42, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• teacher, teacher leave our cheese alone--152.163.100.135 02:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • All you know you're just an - other hole in the cheese.
• BJAODN. *drew 02:53, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is becoming ridiculous. Elfguy 03:11, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with Elf. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:13, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or BJAODN, just so Tony Sidaway can't WP:POINT if he closes this. Ambi 03:21, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Christopher Parham (talk) 03:47, 2005 August 28 (UTC)
• Delete. this is really getting out of hand. Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 03:48, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete silly Jobe6 04:04, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Nooo! Keeeeeeeep the cheese! ESPECIALLY IF ITS STINKY! Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 04:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It is silly though Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 05:02, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Paul Klenk 04:14, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree with above. Amren ^(talk) 04:16, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and BJAODN -- It's obviously some kind of strange parody.. anon added those members to the project, anon also supposedly cites some precedent as meaning that nonsense projects are protected from deletion, something to do with the WP:POINT rule.. By the way, the adding cheese to articles they refer to makes me think of a tiny disruption of that very sort which has been perpetrated by various anonymous users the other day, and could be continuing (i'm not sure).. take a look at [1] and [2]. But most of this cheese insertion. And WP:AN/I#wikicheese_vandal. --Mysidia (talk) 04:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, too obvious parody to be BJAODNed. — JIP | Talk 07:27, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Insert random cheese into Jimbo's beard. Ummm..... make that Delete and BJAODN. Grutness...wha? 08:48, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • This game does not understand the word "random". Eric119 08:49, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Grill it, eat it and Delete it. If the Swiss-Italian Cheese article was Gouda'nuff to be speedily deleted last week then this one deserves to be too before it gets moldy. Fg2 09:22, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense. All their cheese are belong to us. --Cactus.man 14:52, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE. We spent too much time cleaning "YOU SMELL LIKE WIKI-CHEESE!!!!!~TEH LOLZ!" from articles, user pages, and talk pages recently. This "project" is just a magnet for junk like that. Joyous (talk) 15:17, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• I was going to speedy this as silly vandalism and/or WP:POINT, but it's just too funny so I'll vote BJAODN instead. Radiant_>|< 16:50, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is promotion of vandalism. Not every article needs cheese content. - Mgm|^(talk) 17:17, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If this is not a joke, it's promoting vandalism. If this is a joke, it's not funny and it's still promoting vandalism. It probably wouldn't result in very much vandalism but it is clearly hostile to the project of building an encyclopedia, and you can't undo a hostile remark by saying "lighten up, I was just kidding." I have no objection to its going to BJAODN. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:24, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN needs more cheese content. Let's add this to it. Karmafist 21:41, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN please, no more joke WikiProjects! Andrew pmk | Talk 22:11, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Enough recent joke WikiProjects as is. Eric119 08:43, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and BJODN. Protect if moving it to BJODN doesn't stop the activity on it. Thryduulf 10:17, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. -- user:zanimum
• Speedy delete. This page is an attempt to bruise sore egos after the Wikipedians for Decency VFD. Clear violator of WP:POINT, since it even has a ((merge)) tag on it pointing to Wikipedians for Encyclopedic Merit! Not funny enough to be a BJAODN. --Titoxd 23:24, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• I like cheese, but delete nonetheless. Not very BJAODN-worthy. Barno 23:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, do not BJAODN. -Sean Curtin 01:57, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - since when is humor not permitted? — Dan | Talk 23:11, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • When we decided to create something useful - an encyclopedia. We have enough trouble cleaning up after every April Fools Day. We don't need these the rest of the year too. Delete all joke wikiprojects. (I agree that this is not funny enough to be a BJAODN.) Rossami (talk) 13:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and move to BJAODN. Rest in cheese. - Mike Rosoft 16:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN Septentrionalis 21:08, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not funny enough for BJAODN, IMO. Fire Star 14:22, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete don't reward them bt putting it in BJAODN CalJW 22:02, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Don't BJAODN. Not funny, and hassling people who try to delete it is even less so. JesseW, the juggling janitor 21:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.