- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 08:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Awake (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Almost no activity since September 2012. The article count of 47 is falsely inflated by including 23 articles on bit-part actors/actresses involved in the show — those should be removed from the project's scope, as the show is not the primary focus of most of the actors in question.
Of the 24 articles that leaves behind, 10 are GA, 2 are FA, and 1 are FL, followed by 8 in non-article spaces. That leaves only three articles with possible improvement, meaning that this project's workload is almost nonexistant.
tl;dr: There's almost nothing for this project to do. Delete it or upmerge to the TV wikiproject. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:57, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep inactivity is considered a poor reason to delete wikiprojects. The guideline suggests they be tagged as inactive unless they have no content at all. Having a lot of articles at GA or FA ought to be considered a hallmark of a successful project, not one that ought to be deleted. Hut 8.5 21:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and mark as inactive if it is in fact inactive, per Hut 8.5. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to WP:TV as a taskforce. Inactive TV project for a TV show that lasted only 13 episodes comprising one season. Very unlikely to become active again, and not really one of the cult TV shows. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep mark as inactive if necessary. However, work is slowly progressing at this project. TBrandley (T • C • B) 00:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't it be better served as a taskforce of WPTV, as other similar wikiprojects have become TFs, instead then? -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 01:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, although it would not make much of a difference and the formation and structure of this project would have to be kept in its current form. TBrandley (T • C • B) 01:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and mark as inactive if necessary. Better to leave it in place, in the event that someone may improve it. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and mark as inactive - inactivity is not a good reason for deletion. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 03:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.