The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted WP:CSD#U1 at user's request. JohnCD (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Darkness Shines/diffs[edit]

my sock case is over result was I am not sock he still attack me calling me sock again. coming to my edit history to take revenge too. admin has inform me to take it to WP:MFD Highstakes00 (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the SPI Archives already contain this information. No need to put it in more places than that. Achowat (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SPI Archives contain quite a bit of information, I can see why keeping track of things on a smaller scale would be beneficial. But at the same time, I can see why the section header could be considered problematic. I think if the section header "Sock" were renamed to something a little more ambiguous, it would help alleviate the concerns of attacking the editor. - Sudo Ghost 18:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He call me sock. heading is not only attack he also put me in list with other sock. I do not wish to be on his user page list. --Highstakes00 (talk) 18:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not care what you want, if you did not stalk me then perhaps I would not think you a sock?

delete attack page personal attack calling me sock. --Highstakes00 (talk) 18:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As it is not an attack page. It is a very necessary page given I am constantly targeted by sockpuppets. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh drama! DS, since the SPI has proven that The Lofty Stakes are not a sock, would you be ameanable to removing hir name from the list? Achowat (talk) 19:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There ya go[1] No longer labeled as a sock Darkness Shines (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Funny. Now delete my name from list. even the other editor he mention is proven not sock. I have inform him too. --Highstakes00 (talk) 21:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep With caveat to owner that only "pretty darn certain" socks should get mentioned and only after you file the SPI. And deleted if a negative result ensues. Cheers. Collect (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the nominator, User:Highstakes00, has been indefinitely blocked for harassing DS. B music ian 08:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mr Bag & Tag has a habit of tagging new comers as sock puppets he did same to me. My name is also in this list which is a ridiculous personal attack my case was closed. Administrators should delete this page. --I am Agent X 11:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As soon as someone explains how this meets the criteria set forth in WP:ATTACK, till then it can stay. As this page does not attack anyone. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Calling other users sock is a ridiculous attack. You continue to insist on your blame while investigation says opposite. I see how you got poor highstakes blocked by creating this page and reporting him when he objected. Bye bye. --I am Agent X 11:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not calling you a sock, you are listed under others. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya right! Stop playing games. Slight change in heading does not make it a good list. It is a list of sock puppets with heading others now. I did not sign up to your list. --I am Agent X 12:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask the reason the "others" are listed? Achowat (talk) 12:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because I have reason to believe they are not kosher. The reason are not written on that page, nor is there a collection of diffs. The page is just a reminder for me. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attack confirmed now. It is a bad faith insult on users. I shall not stand this insolence. He thinks he is some thing like editor in chief of wikipedia. --I am Agent X 12:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, DS...that doesn't sound to me like an acceptable use or Userspace. I'm still firmly in the delete column. Achowat (talk) 13:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you do not edit the topic area I would not expect you to understand. I do not particularly care which camp you are in or how you cast your vote. There is no valid reason given as yet within policy to delete this page. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether this is an attack page or not, DS, please consider whether this page is really necessary as the official sockpuppet pages seem to cover the issues well and provide an archive of what happened and decisions. So this page seems to be causing unnecessary concern and controversy. --Trödel 14:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I have requested speedy deletion. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.