The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scott Benzel, Mathesis and Mathematikoi, Mt. Wilson Observatory, 2017.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Eveappel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NFCC. Hard to tell if Benzel is even in the photo, so doesn't effectively depict the subject. The subject is also still living, so NFCC wouldn't apply anyway. If it's to illustrate his work, there's no information about this piece in the article except an entire subsection based on Benzel's name in a list of other artists (i.e. we need well-sourced, detailed information to be served by a non-free image of that work). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 12:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the stated purpose is to shoe this particular performance at the observatory so the fact that Benzel is still living is not of particular concern. But, there is no significant sourced commentary about this performance to meet WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Breach (cancelled video game).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Eric Carpenter (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is being used as visual identification for a cancelled video game, but the description does not identify what this is. Is does not look like a cover, poster, title screen or other material that would be suitable for visual identification. It looks more like concept art. There is no significant sourced commentary about this image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree, it's a poor "box art" because it's not one. Something like this would be far more appropriate, as it shows the logo and characters. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VenkateshMaha.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Srivathsan2711 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

"FBMD..." string in metadata suggests this is a Facebook image. Source and evidence of permission are required. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless VRT confirmation of permission is confirmed. The image looks like a selfie, so I doubt they took the photo, but they are being paid to write about the subject of the photo so plausbibly could have permission. -- Whpq (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.