July 17

File:Nagpur Metro Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 10:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nagpur Metro Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Akki17690 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No valid reason provided that the logo is PD — JJMC89(T·C) 01:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nagpur Smart City Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nagpur Smart City Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Akki17690 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Two different authors are specified - Nagpur Municipal Corporation and MoHUA. Which is it? How is the work PD? — JJMC89(T·C) 01:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MM Leftovers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MM Leftovers.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hellbus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC as this cover is not discussed critically or used for educational purposes. We already have one non-free cover and this is not adding enough value to justify inclusion. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Operation Doomsday Complete.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Operation Doomsday Complete.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by EditorE (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is some very brief discussion of the cover art and why it was changed but 1.) it is speculative, 2.) passing, 3.) not discussed at length (very similar to #2), 4.) does not go into detail into what was changed, why, etc., 5.) does not refer to all three of the covers presented, and 6.) does not actually require three pieces of non-free media. The differences between the first two are pretty marginal and can be adequately discussed in text, so they fail WP:NFCC, but the third one also does as there is not an extended, sourced section about the cover art: just a single fairly off-hand reference. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Operation Doomsday Remastered (2015).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Operation Doomsday Remastered (2015).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Davykamanzi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is some very brief discussion of the cover art and why it was changed but 1.) it is speculative, 2.) passing, 3.) not discussed at length (very similar to #2), 4.) does not go into detail into what was changed, why, etc., 5.) does not refer to all three of the covers presented, and 6.) does not actually require three pieces of non-free media. The differences between the first two are pretty marginal and can be adequately discussed in text, so they fail WP:NFCC, but the third one also does as there is not an extended, sourced section about the cover art: just a single fairly off-hand reference. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doombar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doombar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lukehounsome (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#1 as we have a free image which contains the current logo, File:Interior of the New Inn, Wetherby (27th January 2019) 006.jpg. This is an older version of the logo, and so fails WP:NFCC#8 as having this old logo doesn't significantly enhance the article Joseph2302 (talk) 12:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Romantic poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Romantic poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 98Tigerius (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

WP:NFCC#3a + WP:NFCC#8 // + File:Dr. Romantic 2 poster.jpg — Ирука13 15:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a rationale for one poster. Any two others must be removed. — Ирука13 15:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Royal Mail.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 July 25. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 05:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Mail.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.