The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep in Ukraine Yellow Kitchen Photo, remove all other uses -FASTILY 00:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mykhailo Korenovsky family kitchen.webp (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CT55555 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I don't think there is a good reason to keep this one, as there is a free replacement available (File:Dnipro_after_Russian_missile_attack,_2023-01-14_(42-15).jpg). This could only be kept if an article about the kitchen photo is to be created. Bedivere (talk) 03:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think you've misunderstood what the photo represents. It is not just another visual of 2022–2023 Dnipro missile strikes. It's the specific photo that went viral and made global news. Check out Yan Dobronosov for more context. CT55555(talk) 03:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let me elaborate my point. The article of the photographer could use the alternative, free picture instead of his own, copyrighted one while saying "The kitchen of the boxing coach, subject of Dobronosov's picture". As for the boxer's article, it is not even needed in my opinion if the point is illustrating the kitchen of the house where he lived and died. This copyrighted photo could be kept only if there is an article for the picture itself, otherwise these fair use rationales are unconvincing, to me at least. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the free use rationale that I used is for this exact situation.

For transparency, I mentioned this trilogy of delete proposals in the hope of trying to find an elegant solution at Article Rescue Squadron. CT55555(talk) 04:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The picture can be easily replaced by a free alternative (except in the context of an eventual article about the photograph itself, where fair use rationale would be legitimate as no replacement for the actual photo can be generated). Bedivere (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It is the subject of an article now at Ukraine Yellow Kitchen Photo. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  As long as the photo article remains "live", I'm for keeping it. I do not agree with uses on the photographer and boxing coach articles. Bedivere (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep only for Ukraine Yellow Kitchen Photo. The image has been remvoed from the other two article, but if used there, they would not meet WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korematsu google doodle.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Locoscoutla (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The file is a Google Doodle graphic that was used on the article of Fred Korematsu Day. However, as the holiday is increasingly celebrated throughout the United States (see the section on Additional States), free images can be expected to be available from celebrations. This is particularly true in California (which the California government is one of the earliest and biggest promoter of the day), where government works are exempt from copyright. Moreover, the text stated in "Other Commemorations" is also self-explanatory by describing the composition and symbolism of the graphic, and it seems that they were quite sufficient. As a result the file is likely to violate WP:NFCC#1, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Journal of Topology cover.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DePiep (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low quality and resolution version of PD journal cover. Replaced with File:Journal of Topology cover.jpg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion appropriate. (2012 Uploader here). DePiep (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences.tif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luke.j.ruby (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Replaced with a higher quality cover at File:Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences.png on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.