The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
What the serious fuck? This subject is still alive, so a new free image could be taken of him and replaceable. Delete until this subject happens to decease. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 01:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned PD image; File:AState wordmark.png has replaced this file in all articles. ❄ Corkythehornetfan ❄ 04:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned PD image; File:Georgia Southern wordmark.png has replaced this file in all articles. ❄ Corkythehornetfan ❄ 05:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Kept 1 only - Peripitus (Talk) 23:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Both files are non-free cover art being used in the infobox for Evolution (Boyz II Men album). Each file has a non-free use rationale, but they are essentially the same file. The only difference between the two is in the album title is given is English and in the other the album title is given in Spanish. Not sure why both files are needed per WP:NFCC#3a and why the Spanish version cannot be explained using text. Suggest keeping the English version and removing the Spanish version. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Kept 1, deleted 1 - Peripitus (Talk) 23:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Two non-free cover art images being used in the infobox or Legacy: The Greatest Hits Collection. There's a non-free use rationale provided for each file, but these seem to be basically the same cover except for the gray and "Deluxe Edition" text at the bottom of the deluxe edition version. Both of these do not seem necessary per WP:NFCC#3a since the difference between the two covers can be expressed in text. Suggest keeping the "regular" version and removing the "deluxe" version. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
There is no description of the suspicions that affected user rights. I'm Lukas! --Talk 11:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Boldly resolved by another editor. Steel1943 (talk) 15:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't think this image is unique enough to be eligible for copyright in the United States (((PD-ineligible-USonly))), but I am not sure. The check mark-looking line in the bottom right is throwing me off and making me not sure. Steel1943 (talk) 14:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
File is tagged as public domain; however, it includes copyrighted elements (such as a gold-colored version of File:TTC.svg; owner is the Toronto Transit Commission) and is not covered by freedom of panorama. The sole article that this image is included in would probably not benefit much from this image as there is already a similar image that although is copyrighted, should be the image that has a non-free use rationale as it is more current than this image. Esquivalience t 21:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of original source or copyright holder. May failed NFCC#2, definitely fails NFCC#10a. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)