December 12
File:PassengerHoldingUpJetAirways.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PassengerHoldingUpJetAirways.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tnavenger (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails NFCC#8. Is a screenshot of a cell phone video of an unidentified person holding up a flight. The events are described in the article, and seeing an unidentified person does not contribute to the reader's understanding. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sara Statue.JPG
File:Chellapandi.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rehman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chellapandi.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dhuruvanatchathiram (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Inapplicable license; and, photo does not appear to be encyclopedic. Brianga (talk) 04:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Editor is now indef blocked and the image appears to be more of the playing around that got this editor blocked. Not a useful image. -- Whpq (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Go-Gos cover art
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep and remove from The Go-Go's#History. Wikiacc (¶) 16:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GoGos-Vacation.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zana Dark (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:GoGos-WeGotTheBeat.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zana Dark (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free cover art being used in The Go-Go's#History. Each file has a non-free use rationale for the stand-alone article about the album/song and the band, but this type of non-free use in band articles is generally not allowed per WP:NFC#cite_note-2 because it tends to be decorative. Neither piece of cover art is the subject of any sourced discussion in the band's article so the context required by WP:NFCC#8. Moreover, each of the stand-alone articles for the album and song is wikilinked in the band's article, so the cover art may be seen there per number 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. Suggest keep for the stand-alone articles about the album/song and remove from the band's article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Definitely complies with fair use guidelines for the Vacation album article. But the image should be removed from the band article, as it does not meet the fair use guidalines within that article. Rlendog (talk) 12:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
George Michael cover art
File:A memorial for potassium suppository (installation art).jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: remove from On an Island (song). — ξxplicit 06:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:David Gilmour On An Island.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Warren (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free cover art being used in On an Island and On an Island (song). A non-free use rationale is provided for each use, but no source is given other than "The cover art can be obtained from the record label", so it's hard to verify if the same cover art was actually used for both the album and the single. Googling the album shows the cover art is used for the album at Amazon, All Music and Gilmour's official website, but I can't find anything for the single. Unless someone is able to show that this is also the cover art for the single, then I think it should be removed from that article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:5 covers.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:5 covers.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dyolf~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free file being used in Live in Gdańsk#Deluxe edition which looks like a user-created montage of file individual non-free images. File has a non-free use rationale, but its claim that the file is being used at the top of the article as the primary means of identifying the album in the main infobox is not how the file is being used at all. Moreover, if these are five separate album covers which have been combined by the uploader, then per WP:NFG and valid non-free use rationale is needed for each to satisfy WP:NFCC#10c. Even if the rationale(s) could be sorted out, the way the file is currently being used is decorative and lacks the context required by WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFC#cite_note-2. So, unless all of these non-free use issues can be resolved, I suggest delete for the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Alisha playing the character 'Mia' on "Super Cops Vs Super Villains".jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Alisha playing the character 'Mia' on "Super Cops Vs Super Villains".jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thefilmwonder (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Seems to be a tv/movie screenshot, dubious self-work claim. Probable copyvio. FASTILY 09:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rose City Transit 502 in 1961.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete nominated revision. — ξxplicit 06:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:College acceptance rates.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikideas1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Referral owing to logo inclusion ( some of which are not necessarily free logos) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dont delete it I'll update the photo with none trade marked fair use logos. Wikideas1 (talk) 10:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the logos and only put fair use ones in the new uploaded image. Wikideas1 (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Waepa Logo.png
File:Pet Shop Boys - Super.jpg
File:PHOENIX LOGO.jpg
File:Alcatel Onetouch logo.png
File:The Google Boys Arimalam.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The Google Boys Arimalam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dhuruvanatchathiram (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused image by a now blocked editor which was likely intended for addition whatever this editor was playing around with. Whpq (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd toss the image in the dustbin. User seemed to be here to promote some rinky-dink organization of his own fabrication, and the use of the Biography logo in the image is likely a trademark/copyright violation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Ventilator Soundtrack Cover.jpg
File:NYMAS Logo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 18:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NYMAS Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Farawayman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This isn't the organization's logo, it's their website heading which happens to use some shadow. Ridiculous to assume it's an official logo. ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 18:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Next time it'd be easier to just remove it from the article boldly and let it be tagged as unused non-free image. But technically it shouldn't even have the fair use rationale as it's ((PD-textlogo)). Agreed that it isn't adding value to the article. czar 18:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Dichtel 2015 hi-res-download 1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dichtel 2015 hi-res-download 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete along with all the other ones below this that follow the same format (not going to repeat myself over a dozen times). It was deleted on Commons because of licensing issues. Those issues still exist regardless of where it is. We can't keep any of these photos. --Majora (talk) 05:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Kun 2016 hi-res-download 4.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kun 2016 hi-res-download 4.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Basting 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Basting 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fecteau 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fecteau 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Baldwin 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Baldwin 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Khot 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Khot 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Jones 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jones 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Jacobs-Jenkins 2016 hi-res-download 1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jacobs-Jenkins 2016 hi-res-download 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Nelson 2016 hi-res-download 4 ykva7hi.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nelson 2016 hi-res-download 4 ykva7hi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Newman 2016 hi-res-download 2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Newman 2016 hi-res-download 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Orphan 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Orphan 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Prakash 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Prakash 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Redniss 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Redniss 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:ReidKelley 2016 hi-res-download 2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ReidKelley 2016 hi-res-download 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Richards-Kortum 2016 hi-res-download 3.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Richards-Kortum 2016 hi-res-download 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Scott 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Scott 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Stillman 2016 hi-res-download 1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stillman 2016 hi-res-download 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wolfe 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wolfe 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- subject requests deletion. Beatley (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Awuah 2015 hi-res-download 2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Awuah 2015 hi-res-download 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Chandran 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chandran 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Cohen 2015 hi-res-download 1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cohen 2015 hi-res-download 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It is not at all clear what the situation is, and probably would require a legal opinion o the interpretation of the license. On the face, of it, the license as supplied at their website is very specific that the images are under a CC-BY license which allows for commercial use, so these images have the appropriate license. As for the restriction on "media", what does that even mean? Wikipedia is a published medium, so it would seem to me that we are "media". -- Whpq (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Desmond 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Desmond 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Dorrance 2015 hi-res-download 2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dorrance 2015 hi-res-download 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Lerner 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lerner 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Eisenman 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eisenman 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beatley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The Foundation sent in an OTRS ticket explicitly stating that they do not wish to license their images to anyone except "the media", not including Wikipedia, under CC-BY. It can be argued that they may or may not have the legal ability to restrict it, but their expressed intent is clear. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the macarthur foundation responded to an email inquiry by an admin. their intent is unclear, and we cannot get context from the otrs. what does 'except "the media"' mean? is wikipedia media? do personality rights cover this? the CC-BY however, seems clear. Beatley (talk) 21:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia articles are not required to use only files which come form Commons, but files uploaded locally to Wikipedia still have to satisfy WP:COPY, which means images files have to be licensed to allow commercial use by anyone without restriction for them to be "freely licensed" even locally on Wikipedia. In some cases, copyrighted content can be uploaded locally as non-free content as long as its usage satisfies WP:NFCCP. The problem with doing that is that non-free images of living individuals are generally considered to fail WP:NFCC#1, so trying to use it that means it will almost surely be deleted as "replaceable fair use". Since Eisenman is still living, the only option might be to see if another freely licensed image of her exists, or just wait until someone creates another one. Maybe try asking for help at WP:RP or c:COM:PR. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:A Papua New Guinean wooden sculpture, Stanford University New Guinea sculpture garden.jpg
File:A Pathan sowar, 23rd Cavalry (Frontier Force), 1908 (c). Mrs Williamson..jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- File:A Pathan sowar, 23rd Cavalry (Frontier Force), 1908 (c). Mrs Williamson..jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beloochee (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unclear copyright status. No evidence of any previous publication, which is required to enter the public domain. Also, Museum asserts copyright. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Aaron Boucher (8-10-2001).jpg
File:Abramoff scotland3.jpg
File:Essex Police Response Vehicle.jpg