The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
We have several free images of Maddux, we don't specifically need one if him in a Braves uniform. Additionally, its use in the Cy Young award and Braves articles is inappropriate. kelapstick(bainuu) 01:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
File is orphaned and of very low quality. Liam McM (Talk) 13:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Czar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Uploader is insistent that this image could be an exception to non-free content guidelines. This image fails criteria #1 as it is a copyrighted photo for a living person. The uploader can make his case for keeing it here. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I am informed that an administrator will read this. I am requesting immediate deletion of this photo. When I uploaded it, I saw that ted.com, where the photo appeared, did not make their videos totally free, but did make them free for educational purposes. I reasoned that if they did so with their videos, they would also do so with their photos, hence, I uploaded the photo to Wikipedia. I have also had a great deal of personal dealings with the TED organization, and my general sense was that they would make the photo free for educational purposes. But, as I say, it was an educated guess, not a certitude. I now think my reasoning was weak, so, as I say, am requesting deletion. However, I would appreciate if an administrator would speak to the "we want the most attractive photo" argument. I am corresponding with TED and I imagine they will make the photo not totally free, but free for educational purposes, so I believe this issue, of whether it is reasonable to use a photo that is not entirely free but is free for educational purposes and is the most attractive photo of the subject, may arise again. It seems particularly thorny when the photo is of an artist who, by profession, is quite concerned with attractiveness. Thank you. I have written to the Wikipedia Information Team with the same info and request. Greg Dahlen (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Kelapstick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate file exist on commons at c:File:WilliamDickersonDetentionFacility.jpg Arthunter (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Czar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate file exists on commons at c:File:YYM Jeeyar.jpg Arthunter (talk) 19:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Fails non-free content criteria #1: plenty of free images of this person available, and image isn't the subject of specific commentary anyway – czar 19:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)