The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greg Maddux promo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atlswag69 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

We have several free images of Maddux, we don't specifically need one if him in a Braves uniform. Additionally, its use in the Cy Young award and Braves articles is inappropriate. kelapstick^(bainuu) 01:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - replaceable with existing free images. The use in some list articles also is problematic. -- Whpq (talk) 17:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:JerryandJay.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jaylen2020 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File is orphaned and of very low quality. Liam McM (Talk) 13:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I really don't see the purpose of it, particularly because if the low quality. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 17:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Czar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heather Barnett, artist.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Greg Dahlen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploader is insistent that this image could be an exception to non-free content guidelines. This image fails criteria #1 as it is a copyrighted photo for a living person. The uploader can make his case for keeing it here. -- Whpq (talk) 17:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, absolutely replaceable. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 17:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I am the uploader. The image is free for educational purposes, but not for all purposes. I believe it is the most attractive photo of the article subject. Reasoning that we want the encyclopedia to look as good as possible, it seems reasonable to use this photo. I don't reasonably have the means to take a free photo of the subject as she lives in London and I in California, and I don't have photography expertise. Plus I doubt I would want to make it free myself. Greg Dahlen (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "Being the most attractive photo of the article's subject" is the most ridiculous reason I have ever seen! The photograph is copyrighted and she is a living person end of discussion. Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am informed that an administrator will read this. I am requesting immediate deletion of this photo. When I uploaded it, I saw that ted.com, where the photo appeared, did not make their videos totally free, but did make them free for educational purposes. I reasoned that if they did so with their videos, they would also do so with their photos, hence, I uploaded the photo to Wikipedia. I have also had a great deal of personal dealings with the TED organization, and my general sense was that they would make the photo free for educational purposes. But, as I say, it was an educated guess, not a certitude. I now think my reasoning was weak, so, as I say, am requesting deletion. However, I would appreciate if an administrator would speak to the "we want the most attractive photo" argument. I am corresponding with TED and I imagine they will make the photo not totally free, but free for educational purposes, so I believe this issue, of whether it is reasonable to use a photo that is not entirely free but is free for educational purposes and is the most attractive photo of the subject, may arise again. It seems particularly thorny when the photo is of an artist who, by profession, is quite concerned with attractiveness. Thank you. I have written to the Wikipedia Information Team with the same info and request. Greg Dahlen (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Dahlen, if a free image could reasonably made available, such as when the subject is alive, a fair use image will never be acceptable to depict them, even if is a more flattering photo of the subject. If the subject is concerned about the quality of the photo in their Wikipedia article, they are free do donate a photo that they are the copyright owner of, which would then be in compliance with our policies.--kelapstick^(bainuu) 19:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Kelapstick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:WilliamDickersonDetentionFacility.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Notorious4life (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Duplicate file exist on commons at c:File:WilliamDickersonDetentionFacility.jpg Arthunter (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Czar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yadugiri Yathiraja Narayana Ramanuja Jeeyar .jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ravichandra B (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Duplicate file exists on commons at c:File:YYM Jeeyar.jpg Arthunter (talk) 19:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agnez Mo at Plenary Hall, JCC Senayan, Jakarta.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carly Jepsen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails non-free content criteria #1: plenty of free images of this person available, and image isn't the subject of specific commentary anyway – czar 19:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nomination and the fair use ratonale doesn't even apply as it isn't being used for visual identification in the article as it buried down the page and is simply used as yet another photo on the page. -- Whpq (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.