The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Korn22x (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. uploader is blocked due to being vandalism account -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what this is. 68.173.113.106 (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Von Ryan's1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The Von Ryan's (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Therealflyer.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tricklin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image of old flyer with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thnmark1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Leafsfan7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theshopsatwillowbend.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xxswissarmybrand09xx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image looks to be promotional material for a shopping mall in Texas. No encyclopedic value and possibly copyright not owned by uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:52, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Timtim.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Timtim10 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Titolo rosso.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ortoorto (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tobybenson small.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tbenson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomwatkins final.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stepneyjack (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomten.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tomten2008 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tony Carrano.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Daspammer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Possibly personal photo. nice mustache though -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trerhyne.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Trerhyne (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Possibly personal photo -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Troy MacEachern - Age 27.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tmaceachern (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Possibly personal photo -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TSSM FLAG.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gbabasides (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image seems to be a false type of flag for Titan Saturn System Mission No encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tu building.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jwalaad (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image is of Tribhuvan University central administrative building. Same size similar copy of image here judging by size image is most likely not owned by uploader -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TYLER!!!.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luke Jackson213 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tyler2.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cubbyboy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tygaleft.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DYnation (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Image is a promotional photo of musician Tyga but with head cropped off -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tyson Wahl.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sabatinosausage (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tytusiskhandar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iskhandarsyah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Pelphrey headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cardsplayer4life (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of a likely copyvio image deleted following Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 June 5#File:John Pelphrey.jpg Mosmof (talk) 03:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BobbyPetrinoHeadShot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cardsplayer4life (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of a likely copyvio image deleted after Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 June 6#File:BobbyPetrino.jpg Mosmof (talk) 03:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Attached2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Leoboudv (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox, uploaded today as a replacement for another that was nominated at FFD yesterday (here). Slightly better than the predecessor, but still just a random scene with no visual details in it that would be necessary for understanding the article text. The FUR refers mainly to one small detail, a small device attached to the protagonist's neck, but this detail would be extremely easy to just cover with a verbal description. Still an NFCC#8 failure. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comm: This image passes NFCC#8 or 'contextual significance' since it actually illustrates what the Prytt's electronic's device is and why it is the actual title of this Star Trek episode. Please don't file image DR's just because you disagree that one image doesn't fit your criteria when this image clearly shows how 1. Crusher and Picard could read each other's thoughts telepathically through the electronic device attached to the back of their necks and 2. Crusher being caught by the Prytt security team after risking her life to safety. So, her situation is bad. That's why the show's producers called this episode 'Attached.' If one image should be kept, this is the one. I think you have not seen this Star Trek episode whereas I just saw this episode 2 days ago on Canada's space sci-fi television network. So, I know what I'm talking about. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Huh? This image "clearly shows" how the two characters "could read each other's thoughts"? Obviously, it "shows" no such thing. (If it does to you, then you must be psychic or something). And the fact that if you get captured by an enemy force then your "situation is bad" is rather easily understood from a verbal description too; nothing in the image is needed to comprehend it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• A comment. The electronic devices which the Prytt implanted onto Captain Picard and Dr. Crusher are telepathic listening devices. They are supposed to allow the Prytt to read the Captain and the Doctor's innnermost thoughts and the reason for their visit to the Kes-Prytt world. That is why the Prytt Minister says that 'the truth will be revealed soon enough' when they are in the Prytt prison since the device will work its way into their systems. But the devices also allow Picard and Crusher to read each others thoughts in this way--like the fact that Crusher realizes Picard doesn't like the elaborate breakfasts which she had been serving him or that Picard had strong feeling of love for her even before she was widowed--which explains why the Captain was initially reluctant to have Dr. Crusher serve aboard his ship. So, the devices are awkward for both of them and that's part of the reason the show's producers named this episode 'Attached' both literally for the device and metaphorically for the device's emotional impact due to the secrets they uncover between the Captain and the Doctor. An image of the device is useful, I would think. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Your refusal to get the point about how our policy works is now bordering on blockable disruption. This is all irrelevant. All these things about what role those devices play may be of interest in a discussion of the plot, but there is nothing in them that the image as such helps us to understand, over and above what your text helps us to understand. As such, they are utterly irrelevant to a discussion of the image. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I never objected to your proposed deletion of the following ST Power Play image below. I completely agree that its a rather meaningless image...as you correctly claim. But here you requested an image that had a contextual significance and I believed that that the episode title 'Attached' was represented by the electronic device implanted in Picard and Crusher's necks...as shown in this image uploaded here. Why? Because it was 1. attached to their necks and 2. it telepathically linked/attached their thoughts and revealed their hidden secrets to one another. So, it was meaningful to a viewer--in part. Was this not contextually significant per NFCC#8 for this episode? If I am indeed beating the bush as you suggest, can you please kindly suggest what image here might be better? Its just a request...so please don't be offended. I'm just looking for a little guidance from you. If no image fits the bill, its OK. I'm sorry I didn't ask for your opinion before. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:30, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm afraid with this question you are still caught in the fundamental misunderstanding that is unfortunately shared by many editors in this field. You are approaching the issue with the preconceived premise that the infobox should have some image, and your only question is which. As long as you do that, you will never get a solution in line with policy; the only correct answer to it is: "none". What you should do is to start out from the necessities of the text. Write some non-trivial, well sourced analysis of the episode (i.e. not just plot renarration), and then, if and when you come to an impasse, where you feel the critical point you are reporting is not easily understood without visual support, then and only then you should start thinking about adding an image. I couldn't help you with this, because, as you rightly guessed, I have never watched the episode, have no particular interest in it, and the article as it stands right now consists entirely of a poorly done plot renarration; as such its chances of supporting a good case for using an image are close to nil. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• OK. Thank You for your suggestion. It is much appreciated. I'm sorry that you have not watched this episode...but I won't lie to you. I have not watched many of the episodes of Star Trek Voyager or Star Trek: Deep Space Nine either. I never had the time. Most people (like me) know only Star Trek The Next Generation simply because it was the first Star Trek TV series made. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Power Play.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in the infobox of an old article that consists purely of a (badly written) plot renarration. Shows three of the regular cast members of the series standing somewhere, with some light effect visible on their chests. Apparently a random scene; from the caption I cannot even figure out what part of the plot it's supposed to belong to. Evidently no critical discussion and no vital contribution to understanding the episode; purely decorative use, NFCC#8 failure. Was recently tagged for lacking a FUR and then had a completely meaningless generic boilerplate text added, which didn't even attempt to provide an individual justification for whatever it's doing in the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Codelite-main-screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Izhaki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image is a screen shot that is replaced by better quality Commons file: File:Codelite2.0-Screenshot.png -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover Two Kings (1).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rabbijacobs (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Also, uploader originally uploaded it as PD-self but then added this gem underneath: "Use of this and all graphics from this article are hereby under strict prohibition prior to written permission from the author." -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - While I sympathise with Gen. Quon's defence, it has not been demonstrated by those seeking to keep the image how it significantly increases reader's understanding in a way that text alone could not. - Peripitus (Talk) 04:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Office US- E-mail Surveillance screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CPnieuws (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Seemingly random image. Not critically discussed. The fact that two characters were standing next to each other is better explained in text. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the caption of the image successfully explains why this image is in the infobox: "Sadiq sets up e-mail monitoring software on Michael's computer. The episode guest starred Omi Vaidya (left), who designed his own costume." I thought about uploading a screenshot of Michael and Jim singing at Jim's party, but I changed my mind, because that scene is not directly related to the title of the episode. Also, I think that people will immediately recognize which episode this is when they see the image, because I'm pretty sure this is the only time Sadiq is seen in Michael's office. CPnieuws (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. If the costume is supposed to be the point being illustrated, this picture is useless: it shows nothing of it, except for the turban, and the latter can easily be described in words (what's hard to understand about "X wears a red turban during the episode"?). The fact that this actor featured in the episode can also be covered in words, and is already illustrated with a free photograph of the actor further down in the article. Other than that, it's really just what Stefan2 says: two guys next to each other, in a situation whose visual details tell us diddly sqat about the episode. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the sole purpose of an image in an infobox were to explain a situation that can't easily be described with words, I don't see how any image in an infobox of a The Office episode would have a purpose, since everything that happens in the show can be explained without an image. Surely you don't think all of the infobox images of The Office episodes should be removed. This image helps people recognize the episode quickly. I also don't think the purpose is to show Vaidya's costume; I don't think the line about his costume should be in the caption. CPnieuws (talk) 16:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do think that the large majority of infobox images in these episode articles should be removed. And you yourself just gave the reason why. TV episode articles are a topic area where non-free content abuse has been rampant for years, and just because the cleanup has been far behind doesn't mean the area will remain exempt from our foundation policies forever. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As much as I understand the argument "This is just two guys sitting there", this is a different situation: First of all, Vaidya's costume is described in the article and is sourced to critical commentary in the production section. Second, his costume was the reason he was cast, per his admission (it separated him for others and he speculated it was what the show needed). Saying that you can described this in words in simplistic, but wrong, as there are many, many varieties of turbans, and Vaidya claimed he originally wore a towel to his audition (so the picture shows the reader his finished costume), and thus, one size does not fit all. Thirdly, the scene illustrates the main conceit of the episode, which is E-mail Surveillance. In this scene, the Tech Guy (Vaidya), sets up Michael's account. Finally, as CPnieuws pointed out, The Office is supposed to take place in the real world, and thus, many of the screen caps would not be particularly "out-there". I understand that "hard for words" is very, very applicable for sci-fi and fantasy, where effects can be difficult to describe. But this places a negative bias against "realistic" shows, such as this. Just because it isn't the most hardest shot to describe, it is sourced to critical commentary, and aids the reader in identifying Vaidya's costume, which is a part of the article. Thus, this image should not be deleted.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Comment, I wish these speedy-deleters wouldn't use the generic "not critically discussed" on these nominations. As much as pics get deleted for using generic "boilerplate" rationale, saying "Not critically discussed" is just as bad. Take this image; it IS in fact critically discussed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Looking 4 Myself Deluxe Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rayman95 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover of the same product: File:Looking4Myself.PNG Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete' per nominator. — Gabe 19 ^{(talk contribs)} 20:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hall and Oates Voices alternative cover art.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Grundle2600 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover: File:Hall Oates Voices.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nickel creek alternative cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nived 90 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover: File:Nickel Creek-Nickel Creek.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ellington Uptown alternative cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DISEman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover: File:Ellington Uptown.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghetto Gothic (alternative cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sugar Bear (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover: File:Ghetto Gothic.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Doesn't this convey additional information that a single cover could not? It's a photo of Van Peebles, not a painting. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 20:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perfect Time Alternative Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Filastin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover: File:MoyaBrennan PerfectTime.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an alternative cover, the template gives provision for such. I oppose deletion.--Filastin (talk) 11:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The template might give provision for additional images, but WP:NFCC#3a does not. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two Horizons - Alternative cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Filastin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover: File:MoyaBrennan TwoHorizons enh.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an alternative cover, the template gives provision for such. I oppose deletion.--Filastin (talk) 11:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noise (album) alternative cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sampm (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover: File:Noise (album).jpg Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twenty One Alternative Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Misssy T (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a: the article already has a different cover. Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kylie-Minogue-Enjoy-Yourself-Alternative-Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Underneath-it-All (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a: the article already contains a different cover. Stefan2 (talk) 19:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strike! alternative cover.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Muhandes (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Strike! Back cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Muhandes (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fail WP:NFCC#3a: the article already contains a different cover. Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Venerable alternative cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Malconfort (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a: the article already contains a different cover. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Connection Soundtrack alternative cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nyctc7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a: the article already contains a different cover. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vote to keep. The cover in question is an alternate score and a different record all together (but still a soundtrack from "The Connection").--Nyctc7 (talk) 21:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:$(KGrHqQOKj4E37cKKMWHBOLJTmrr2Q~~ 12.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carl savich (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not critically discussed, so fails WP:NFCC#8. File:You Don't Know Me cover art.jpg is enough. Stefan2 (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garik.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Garik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused user photo. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with deleting this photo. garik (talk) 08:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sweet.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Willskate4food32 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Out of scope: unidentified people. Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unidentified people, orphaned, purpose not clear. Also overshadows file from commons. CyanGardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 11:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinafore.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Javsav (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused photo of people who don't seem to be notable. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.